「福州踢門小仙女」事件,小仙女想要詐騙外送員卻沒想到被告
這起「福州踢門小仙女」事件,在中國網路上引發熱烈討論。事情的起因看似單純,卻因當事女子的蠻橫行徑,演變成一場鬧劇。
事情發生時,一名外送員不小心將餐點送錯,誤送到一間臨近小店。這位被網友稱為「小仙女」的女子前往該店領取餐點,明明親手接過餐點,卻在尚未走出店門時,立刻打電話給外送員,聲稱自己並沒有拿到外賣。
店主對此非常不滿,因為就在幾秒鐘前,餐點才剛交到女子手裡,怎麼轉眼就否認了?若真這樣算,責任豈不是要落在自己頭上?於是店主當面勸她,不要為難一個辛苦送餐的騎手。然而女子完全不覺得自己有錯,反而與店主爆發爭執。爭論中,她情緒失控,竟然猛力一腳踹向店門,硬生生把門踢壞了。事後,她甚至放話威脅,揚言隔天要找人「打死」店主。
店主立刻報警。女子被警方帶走時依舊嘴硬,但當店主拿出監控錄像為證,她立刻態度轉變,要求私下調解。然而,店主拒絕和解,決定將事情告上法庭。此事曝光後,不少網友直呼「看得極度舒適」。大家普遍認為,這樣的人若不依法嚴懲,只會更加肆無忌憚。雖然事件本身帶有戲劇性,但也反映了現實中部分人仗著外貌或身份,自以為能為所欲為,卻在鐵證面前無處可逃。
整起事件既荒唐又警醒,讓人再次意識到法律與監控的重要,也引發社會對「任性妄為」與「公平正義」的深刻討論。
The incident of the so-called “door-kicking fairy” in Fuzhou has recently become a hot topic online, sparking widespread discussion. What started as a simple delivery mix-up quickly escalated into an outrageous scene due to the woman’s aggressive behavior.
The situation began when a food delivery rider mistakenly sent an order to a nearby shop instead of the customer’s address. The young woman—dubbed by netizens as a “little fairy” because of her fashionable appearance—went to the shop to collect the meal. Yet, even before leaving the store, she called the rider and claimed she had not received her order.
This left the shop owner furious. After all, the food had just been handed to her moments earlier—how could she immediately deny it? If her words were taken at face value, the blame would fall on him. The owner then tried to reason with her, asking why she would make things difficult for the delivery rider.
To his surprise, the woman refused to back down and instead quarreled with him. In the heat of the argument, she suddenly lashed out, delivering a powerful kick to the shop’s door and breaking it. Not stopping there, she even threatened to return the next day with people to “beat the shop owner to death.”
The police were called, and the woman was taken in for questioning. At first, she remained defiant, but once the shop owner produced surveillance footage clearly showing her actions, her attitude changed immediately. She asked for mediation in hopes of settling the matter privately.
However, the shop owner refused any reconciliation and insisted on pressing charges. This outcome, many netizens commented, felt “immensely satisfying.” Online discussions largely agreed that individuals like her must face consequences; otherwise, they might continue to act as if they were above the law.
Though dramatic, the incident highlights a broader reality: some people, emboldened by appearance or arrogance, believe they can do as they please—until undeniable evidence exposes them. The case has not only amused the public but also underscored the importance of the rule of law and accountability in everyday life.

- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4