成都男子何某某（網名「追風小葉」）因在地鐵上被兩名女子誤認鞋內藏有攝像頭偷拍而引發公眾關注。事件發生於2023年6月，當時這兩名女子指控何某某鞋內藏有偷拍裝置。警方到場檢查後，確認何某某清白。雖然警方證實其無不法行為，但何某某認為兩名女子未能給予真誠道歉，因此決定透過法律途徑維權，起訴兩名女子及成都地鐵，要求賠償並公開道歉，主張其一般人格權受到侵害。

一審於2023年12月12日宣判，法院認定兩名女子及成都地鐵未構成侵權，駁回何某某要求公開道歉及賠償5萬元的訴求。對此判決，何某某不服，認為道歉缺乏誠意，拒絕和解。2024年5月30日，兩名女子透過媒體公開道歉，但何某某依然堅持其訴求未得到真正滿足。之後，雙方進行六次調解仍未達成共識。至2024年7月24日，何某某明確表示將透過法律途徑解決爭議，拒絕任何私下和解。

案件二審於2025年9月8日在成都鐵路運輸中級人民法院開庭。此時，成都地鐵已不再作為被上訴人，僅剩兩名女子作為被告。庭審中，何某某穿著事發時相同款式的鞋出庭，他表示這個行為沒有特殊意圖，只是為強調事件的影響範圍不應因其網路維權行為而受到責怪。二審爭議的核心焦點集中在事件影響範圍的界定，以及網路維權行為的責任歸屬問題。庭審持續約三小時，最終判決將擇期宣佈。

這起事件在社會上引起廣泛關注，不僅因為誤認偷拍的公共安全疑慮，也凸顯個人尊嚴受侵犯時，如何透過法律途徑追求道歉與賠償的問題。2023年6月，何某某被迫當眾脫鞋證明清白，事件經過曝光後引發討論，社會輿論對公眾誤判、人格權保護與網路維權界限均產生關注。案件二審的結果被視為對類似公共誤會及個人權益保護的重要參考，對未來同類爭議的法律處理與社會觀感具有示範意義。

Chengdu resident He Moumou, known online as “Zhuifeng Xiaoye,” became the center of public attention after being mistakenly accused by two women of hiding a camera in his shoes to secretly film passengers on the subway. The incident occurred in June 2023, when the two women alleged that He had a hidden camera in his shoes. Police arrived at the scene and confirmed that He was innocent. Despite this, He felt that the women did not offer a sincere apology, and he decided to pursue legal action, filing a lawsuit against the two women and the Chengdu Metro, claiming that his personal dignity had been violated and seeking both compensation and a public apology.

The first trial concluded on December 12, 2023. The court ruled that neither the two women nor the Chengdu Metro had committed any infringement, rejecting He’s demands for an apology and a 50,000 yuan compensation. Unsatisfied with this verdict, He argued that the apology lacked sincerity and refused to settle. On May 30, 2024, the two women publicly apologized through the media, but He still insisted that his demands had not been genuinely met. Following six rounds of unsuccessful mediation, He clearly stated on July 24, 2024, that he would resolve the dispute through the legal system, rejecting any private settlement.

The second trial took place on September 8, 2025, at the Chengdu Railway Transport Intermediate Court. By this time, the Chengdu Metro was no longer a defendant, leaving only the two women as the respondents. During the hearing, He appeared wearing the same shoes from the incident. He explained that the choice had no special significance but was intended to highlight that the impact of the incident should not be blamed on his online rights-protection efforts. The main points of contention in the second trial centered on defining the scope of the incident’s impact and clarifying the responsibilities related to online rights-protection actions. The hearing lasted approximately three hours, and the final judgment will be announced at a later date.

The incident has attracted widespread attention in society, not only due to public safety concerns over mistaken accusations but also for highlighting how individuals can legally seek apologies and compensation when their dignity is infringed. In June 2023, He was forced to remove his shoes in public to prove his innocence, and the widely circulated incident sparked debates about public misjudgments, the protection of personal rights, and the limits of online advocacy. The outcome of the second trial is seen as an important reference for handling similar public misunderstandings and protecting individual rights in the future, offering guidance on both legal procedures and societal perceptions in such cases.