近期，台灣知名網紅陳之漢（俗稱“館長”）再度成為網路熱議焦點，原因在於網友挖出他過去的言論與行為歷史，揭示出其態度與立場的顯著轉變。根據網路流傳的資料，早在2020年前，陳之漢在直播中經常對中國大陸發表負面評論，包括批評“大陸經濟不行”、“民生困苦”等言論，態度鮮明且毫不掩飾。然而，自從他遭遇槍擊事件後，與民進黨陣營發生衝突，態度開始出現大幅調整，逐漸在公開場合表現出“力挺大陸”的姿態。

許多網友認為，這種態度轉變並非源自真心，而是一種見風使舵、投機取巧的策略。有人形容，陳之漢的最終目的是“圈錢”，善於將事件或人物評價翻轉，按照自身利益調整言行：若外界不買單，他便迅速改變口吻，甚至翻臉。這種雙面人的特質在網路上引發廣泛批評，不少評論指出，他表面上表現出的“親陸”姿態，更多是迎合流量與關注，而非真正關心兩岸事務。

進一步分析，陳之漢的行為還揭示其在兩岸關係觀念上的認知錯位。他所塑造的所謂“兩岸橋樑”的形象，實際上建立在台灣社會流行的“偶像政治”思維上，即認為只要表面上表現出親大陸立場，就能獲得無條件的支持和包容。但這種方式在大陸並不奏效，因為大陸社會對“偶像政治”抱持理性甚至警惕態度，真正受尊重與認可的行為是踏實做事、實際貢獻，而非直播間裡的吹噓與表演。

總的來說，陳之漢事件表面上似乎只是直播爭論或粉絲互動的話題，但其背後反映的是公眾人物在兩岸認知、言行一致性以及真誠度上的問題。網友們對其態度轉變的批評，不僅是針對個人品行，更涉及公眾人物如何在兩岸關係中建立信任，以及網路輿論對真實行為與表面言論之間差距的敏感度。此事件也提醒公眾人物，若要在跨文化或跨地區議題中獲得長期信任，僅靠表面姿態與迎合流量，是無法獲得真正尊重的。

Recently, Taiwanese internet celebrity Chen Zhihan, popularly known as “Guan Zhang” or “The Manager,” has once again become a hot topic online, as netizens dug up his past statements and revealed a significant shift in his public stance. Before 2020, Chen frequently made negative remarks about mainland China during his live streams, criticizing the economy and standards of living with blunt and outspoken language. However, following a gun attack against him and his subsequent fallout with Taiwan’s Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), his tone shifted dramatically, and he began publicly expressing support for mainland China.

Many netizens argue that this change was not sincere, but rather opportunistic—a strategy to align himself with favorable circumstances. Critics claim that Chen’s ultimate goal is financial gain and audience attention, adjusting his opinions and behavior according to trends and public reception. If his audience does not respond favorably, he quickly reverses his stance. This dual-faced behavior has drawn widespread criticism online, with many noting that his apparent “pro-China” persona is more about attracting traffic and attention than genuine concern for cross-strait relations.

A deeper analysis suggests that Chen’s actions reveal a cognitive misalignment in his understanding of cross-strait issues. His self-styled image as a “bridge between Taiwan and mainland China” seems rooted in Taiwan’s popular “idol politics” mindset—that merely showing a pro-mainland stance on the surface will earn unconditional support. However, this approach is ineffective in mainland China, where society tends to value substance over performative gestures. Real credibility and respect are earned through consistent, practical actions rather than boastful claims or theatrical displays in live streams.

In summary, while the Chen Zhihan incident may appear as a routine clash or online feud, it highlights broader issues regarding public figures’ credibility, consistency, and sincerity in sensitive cross-strait matters. Netizens’ criticism reflects not just personal disapproval, but also a broader expectation that public figures maintain integrity and genuine engagement, rather than relying on superficial posturing and opportunistic shifts to capture attention. This case serves as a reminder that true trust and respect—especially in cross-cultural or politically sensitive contexts—cannot be built on performative gestures alone.