2025年11月15日，港媒報導，前TVB花旦鐘嘉欣在加拿大正式向丈夫Jeremy提起訴訟，要求重新分割財產並爭取三名子女的撫養權。與此同時，Jeremy則以誹謗及違反婚前協議反訴，雙方的婚姻糾紛因此進一步公開化，成為港澳及海外華人媒體關注的焦點。

訴訟進展方面，鐘嘉欣於2025年10月28日透過直播公開婚前協議的副本，指控Jeremy存在欺騙行為，並稱協議條款在財產分配上對她不公平。對此，Jeremy予以否認，並提出反訴，目前雙方尚未達成任何和解，案件仍在加拿大法院審理之中。

婚姻矛盾是此次事件的核心。鐘嘉欣指出，婚後自己全心照顧三名子女——長女9歲、次子7歲、幼女3歲——長期忽略丈夫的情感需求，導致夫妻關係逐漸疏離。而Jeremy則抱怨缺乏陪伴，甚至無法一起完成一部電影的觀賞，雙方對家庭生活的期待與現實差距加大，成為矛盾累積的主因。

在子女撫養權方面，雙方各自主張具備優勢。鐘嘉欣強調自己是日常照料的主要負責人，且隨著復出後工作邀約增加，擁有穩定收入，可為子女提供穩定生活；Jeremy則依托其脊醫職業收入及加拿大的穩定生活環境，主張自己同樣有能力為孩子提供良好成長條件。法院將以“兒童最佳利益”為原則，綜合評估雙方的照顧能力與生活環境，作出撫養權判定。

財產糾紛亦是爭議焦點。鐘嘉欣指控Jeremy在婚姻期間隱瞞財務狀況並轉移資產，因此要求重新分割財產；Jeremy則強調婚前協議具有法律效力，並指責鐘嘉欣藉此炒作媒體焦點。婚前協議涉及婚後收入分配及資產管理等條款，合法性與公平性仍存在爭議，案件最終結果尚待法院裁定。

針對外界關注，11月15日鐘嘉欣出席公開活動時對婚變傳聞回應稱“不用理會”，但未直接否認訴訟的存在。此前，她在節目中坦言婚姻壓力，並表示“孩子永遠是第一位”，透露在維護子女利益方面仍是她最關注的核心。此案件的後續發展將持續受到媒體與公眾的關注，尤其是關於子女撫養與財產分割的最終判決。

On November 15, 2025, Hong Kong media reported that former TVB actress Linda Chung (Zhong Jiaxin) officially filed a lawsuit against her husband Jeremy in Canada, seeking to redistribute marital assets and gain custody of their three children. In response, Jeremy filed a counterclaim citing defamation and breach of their prenuptial agreement. The legal battle has brought the couple’s marital disputes into the public eye, drawing widespread attention from both Hong Kong and overseas Chinese media.

Regarding the progress of the lawsuit, Linda Chung publicly shared a copy of the prenuptial agreement via livestream on October 28, 2025, alleging that Jeremy had engaged in deceptive behavior and that the terms of the agreement were unfair in terms of property division. Jeremy has denied these allegations and filed a counterclaim. To date, no settlement has been reached, and the case remains under review in a Canadian court.

The underlying marital conflicts are central to the dispute. Linda Chung stated that after marriage she devoted herself entirely to raising their three children—her eldest daughter aged nine, her son aged seven, and the youngest daughter aged three—which led to the long-term neglect of her husband’s emotional needs and a gradual distancing between them. Jeremy, on the other hand, complained about the lack of companionship, citing even the inability to watch a movie together. The mismatch between expectations and reality in family life has intensified the couple’s tensions.

In terms of child custody, both parties claim advantages. Linda Chung emphasizes that she has been the primary caregiver and, following her career resurgence, now has a stable income to provide a consistent living environment for the children. Jeremy, meanwhile, relies on his career as a chiropractor and the stability of life in Canada to assert his ability to provide for the children. The court will make custody decisions based on the principle of the “best interests of the child,” evaluating both parents’ caregiving capabilities and living conditions.

Property disputes are also a major point of contention. Linda Chung accuses Jeremy of concealing financial information and transferring assets during the marriage, seeking a redistribution of property. Jeremy maintains that the prenuptial agreement is legally valid and accuses Linda of using the dispute to attract media attention. The agreement includes clauses related to the management and distribution of income and assets after marriage, and its legality and fairness remain contested. The final resolution of this issue will depend on the court’s judgment.

Addressing public speculation, Linda Chung attended a public event on November 15 and remarked regarding the marital rumors, “There’s no need to pay attention,” without directly denying the existence of the lawsuit. Earlier, she had acknowledged the pressures of marriage in a program interview, emphasizing that “the children will always come first,” indicating that her primary concern remains the welfare of her children. The case continues to attract media and public attention, particularly regarding the final determinations of child custody and property division.