根據俄羅斯國防部發布的訊息，從莫斯科時間11月24日深夜23點至25日清晨7之間，俄軍在南部多個地區攔截並擊落大約249架烏克蘭無人機。這些無人機主要集中在黑海上空、克拉斯諾達爾邊疆區以及羅斯托夫州，其中黑海方向約116架、克拉斯諾達爾邊疆區約76架，而羅斯托夫州則有16架被擊落。

在克拉斯諾達爾邊疆區，當地行政長官通報指出，無人機襲擊造成至少6名平民受傷，並導致超過20棟住宅受損。羅斯托夫州方面則傳出更嚴重的傷亡，州長表示，攻擊造成3人死亡，另有約10人受傷。黑海沿岸的港口城市諾沃羅西斯克（Novorossiysk）及周邊地區亦傳出住宅樓遭擊中、倉庫及油品設施受損的情況，顯示攻擊範圍不僅涉及軍事設施，也波及城市民間基礎建設。

此次事件凸顯出俄烏戰事在無人機領域的升級。俄方強調一夜之間擊落近 250 架無人機，顯示襲擊密度與規模比過去更大，使俄南部沿黑海地區的防空壓力急遽升高。此外，烏克蘭的攻擊目標逐漸從前線基地擴展到俄境內更後方的位置，包括油輸港口、市區住宅及管線設施。像諾沃羅西斯克與圖阿普謝（Tuapse）等重要港口城鎮都被點名遭受波及，甚至傳出油管控制設施受損，使這類攻擊具有干擾俄國能源出口與後勤的意圖。

在更大的國際背景下，這波攻擊也與外交局勢產生交集。正值美國與烏克蘭在瑞士日內瓦討論新的和平方案之際，美方原提出的28點計畫已縮減為19點，具爭議性的部分留待美烏領導人進一步決定。在這種外交博弈中，烏方可能藉由持續發動攻擊增加談判籌碼，而俄方則透過公布大規模擊落數據，展示其防衛能力，以平衡外交壓力。同時，美國白宮也透露，本週美國總統特朗普並未安排與烏克蘭總統澤連斯基的會晤，顯示美烏之間在外交節奏上仍存在距離。

俄羅斯方面的官方回應集中在強調其防空系統能有效應對密集攻擊，並將責任歸咎於烏克蘭持續的大規模軍事行動。地方政府亦陸續通報損害與傷亡情況。而烏克蘭方面則尚未就俄方公布的攔截數量做出明確回應，使得事件的細節仍有待後續公開。

從目前情勢觀察，未來的發展可能面臨多重挑戰。俄南部的防空與監控勢必加強，而烏克蘭可能繼續提升其遠距無人機與巡航無人機的能力。若攻擊持續瞄準俄國油輸端口及能源設施，有可能對俄國經濟與軍事供應線造成進一步壓力。隨著美烏談判尚未定案，前線的軍事行動恐將成為談判桌上的影響因素之一。此外，無人機襲擊已經造成平民死傷和住宅損害，未來若攻擊升级，對區域安全與人道情勢的衝擊可能更加嚴重。最後，在戰爭長期化的背景下，雙方在無人機與防空上的持續投入也象徵著資源消耗不斷加劇，使衝突更難在短期內緩和。

According to a statement released by the Russian Ministry of Defense, between 11 p.m. on November 24 and 7 a.m. on November 25 (Moscow time), Russian forces intercepted and shot down roughly 249 Ukrainian drones across several regions in the country’s south. Most of the drones were detected over the Black Sea, Krasnodar Krai, and Rostov Oblast, with about 116 downed over the Black Sea, 76 over Krasnodar Krai, and 16 over Rostov Oblast.

In Krasnodar Krai, the regional governor reported that the drone strikes injured at least six civilians and damaged more than twenty residential buildings. Rostov Oblast suffered even heavier casualties, with the governor confirming three deaths and around ten injuries. Additional reports from the Black Sea coastal city of Novorossiysk and surrounding areas indicated that residential buildings, warehouses, and fuel-related facilities were also hit—evidence that the attacks extended beyond military sites and into civilian infrastructure.

The incident highlights an escalation in the drone warfare dimension of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Russia emphasized that nearly 250 drones were shot down in a single night, suggesting a significant increase in both the intensity and scale of Ukrainian strikes. Moreover, Ukraine’s targets appear to be shifting from frontline military positions toward deeper areas inside Russian territory, including oil export ports, residential zones, and pipeline facilities. Key port cities such as Novorossiysk and Tuapse were specifically mentioned among the affected locations, with reports of damage to pipeline control infrastructure, underscoring Ukraine’s apparent intent to disrupt Russia’s energy exports and logistical operations.

This wave of attacks also intersects with ongoing diplomatic developments. As the strikes unfolded, the United States and Ukraine were holding discussions in Geneva over a new U.S.-proposed peace framework. Washington’s original 28-point plan has reportedly been reduced to 19 points, with more contentious issues left for the two presidents to decide. In this context, Ukraine may be using military pressure to strengthen its negotiating position, while Russia, by publicizing large-scale interception figures, seeks to demonstrate defensive strength and counter diplomatic pressure. Meanwhile, the White House noted that President Donald Trump has no meeting scheduled with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy this week, hinting at continued distance in U.S.–Ukraine diplomatic coordination.

Russia’s official response has centered on asserting the effectiveness of its air defense systems and attributing responsibility to Ukraine’s “large-scale and prolonged” offensive actions. Regional authorities also continued releasing details about damage and casualties. Ukraine, however, has not issued a comprehensive public statement addressing Russia’s claimed interception numbers, leaving parts of the incident unconfirmed.

Looking ahead, several challenges and developments may emerge. Russia is likely to reinforce air defenses and surveillance across its southern regions, while Ukraine may continue advancing its long-range and cruise-type drone capabilities. Should Ukrainian strikes increasingly target Russian oil export terminals and energy infrastructure, the resulting disruptions could affect Russia’s wartime logistics and economic throughput. As U.S.–Ukraine peace discussions remain unresolved, on-the-ground military actions may play an increasingly influential role in shaping negotiation dynamics. Civilian harm and infrastructure damage are already mounting, raising humanitarian and regional security concerns should the attacks intensify further. Ultimately, the scale of drone use and countermeasures from both sides reflects a deepening resource-intensive confrontation, complicating prospects for a near-term de-escalation of the conflict.