在台北捷運防範恐怖攻擊與整體安全強化的思路上，近年來的方向已逐漸與上海地鐵那種「全面實體安檢」模式拉開距離。特別是配合2025年最新一輪的安全演練成果與政策調整，台北的策略更偏向以科技輔助、快速反應與社會韌性為核心，試圖在公共安全與城市效率之間取得平衡。

首先，在即時監控與反應機制方面，台北市政府正加速推動AI智能監視系統的布建。這類監視器不再只是被動錄影，而是透過影像辨識技術，即時分析人流動線與行為特徵，針對可能的異常狀態，例如快速逼近他人、疑似持刀姿勢或激烈肢體動作，提早發出警示。其關鍵價值不在於「事後蒐證」，而是爭取寶貴的前幾十秒，讓站務人員或捷運警察能迅速介入。同時，市府也刻意提高捷運警察與保全人員的可見度，透過更密集、可被民眾感知的巡邏方式，一方面形成威嚇效果，另一方面也修補公共空間中因隨機暴力事件而受損的安全信任感。

在資訊通報層面，台北也開始導入更貼近災防體系的即時警示工具。根據目前規劃，最快在2025年底，當捷運系統內發生重大治安或暴力事件時，可針對特定站點及其周邊區域，發送細胞廣播簡訊，提醒民眾避開該區、暫緩進站，或依指示就地掩蔽。這類做法的重點，在於避免不知情的乘客持續湧入風險區域，也能降低恐慌情緒的擴散。

在管理規範方面，台北捷運於2025年12月正式修正並公告「旅客進站裝扮」相關規定，這被視為介於自由與安全之間的一次制度調整。新規並非全面禁止特殊穿著，而是針對可能影響公共安全的情況賦予第一線人員更明確的處置依據。若旅客配戴全臉面具、或穿著過於寬大、明顯不符季節且有藏匿危險物品疑慮的服裝，並在勸導後仍拒絕配合，北捷得以依法拒絕載運。此外，對於攜帶危險物品、蓄意干擾行車或站內秩序的行為，也同步提高處罰強度，最高可處以7,500元罰鍰，藉此強化法律的嚇阻效果，而非單靠道德勸說。

在民防與救護資源的強化上，專家普遍認為捷運安全不能只停留在「防止事件發生」，也必須假設最壞情境並提升「傷害控制」能力。因此，除了現有的AED設備外，建議在捷運站內同步配置簡易止血包，內含止血帶、壓迫繃帶等器材，以應對隨機攻擊或爆炸造成的嚴重出血傷勢。這樣的設計，能在救護人員抵達前，爭取黃金幾分鐘，顯著提高存活率。另一方面，政府與捷運公司也逐步加強對民眾的防衛宣導，強調在突發攻擊時，應優先拉開距離、就近掩蔽，並善用背包、雨傘等隨身物品作為簡易防護，同時透過車廂內的緊急對講機或站內人員通報，避免盲目逃竄造成二次傷害。

至於是否引入類似上海地鐵的全面實體安檢，台北在政策討論中始終保持高度保留態度。一個關鍵考量在於效率與人流的衝突。上海模式在尖峰時段常需排隊一至兩分鐘才能進站，對以短程、高頻率通勤為主的台北捷運而言，可能大幅降低使用意願，甚至迫使民眾轉向機車或私人運具，反而增加城市整體風險。此外，安檢排隊所形成的站外人潮聚集，本身也被不少安全專家視為新的脆弱點，一旦遭到攻擊，後果可能更加嚴重。

法律與隱私層面的爭議同樣不可忽視。在台灣，任何涉及身分查驗或人身檢查的行為，都必須符合《警察職權行使法》所要求的「合理懷疑」原則，若貿然推動全面安檢，勢必引發適法性與隱私權侵害的爭論，甚至動搖民眾對公共運輸系統的信任基礎。

綜合而言，台北捷運目前所選擇的路徑，並不是以高強度、全面性的實體檢查來換取表面的安全感，而是透過科技預警系統縮短反應時間、提高見警率形成即時威嚇、完善通報與救護流程，以及提升民眾自身的防衛與應變能力，逐步打造一種更具彈性與韌性的都市安全網絡。這種模式或許不如安檢門直觀，但在自由、效率與安全之間，仍被視為較符合台北城市特質的長期解方。

In terms of preventing terrorist attacks and strengthening overall safety on the Taipei Metro, the city has gradually chosen a path that clearly diverges from Shanghai Metro’s model of comprehensive physical security screening. Especially in light of the latest security drills and policy adjustments introduced in 2025, Taipei’s approach places greater emphasis on technology-assisted early warning, rapid response, and social resilience, seeking a balance between public safety and urban efficiency.

First, regarding real-time monitoring and response mechanisms, the Taipei City Government is accelerating the deployment of AI-powered surveillance systems. These cameras are no longer limited to passive recording; instead, they use image recognition technology to analyze passenger flow and behavioral patterns in real time. When potentially abnormal situations are detected—such as aggressive movements, sudden close approaches to others, or gestures resembling the use of knives—the system can issue early alerts. The core value of this technology lies not in post-incident evidence collection, but in gaining crucial seconds that allow station staff or metro police to intervene quickly. At the same time, the city has deliberately increased the visibility of metro police and security personnel. More frequent and noticeable patrols serve both as a deterrent and as a means to restore public confidence in shared spaces that may have been shaken by random violent incidents.

In terms of information alerts, Taipei is also integrating measures similar to those used in disaster prevention systems. According to current plans, as early as the end of 2025, when a serious security incident occurs within the metro system, cell broadcast alerts can be sent to passengers in specific stations and surrounding areas. These messages would advise the public to avoid the affected zone, delay entry, or follow instructions to take cover. The primary goal is to prevent uninformed passengers from continuing to enter high-risk areas and to reduce the spread of panic.

On the regulatory side, Taipei Metro officially revised and announced new rules regarding “passenger attire when entering stations” in December 2025. This adjustment represents an attempt to strike a balance between personal freedom and public safety. Rather than banning unconventional clothing outright, the new rules provide frontline staff with clearer authority to act when attire raises legitimate security concerns. If a passenger wears a full-face mask or excessively loose, seasonally inappropriate clothing that could potentially conceal dangerous items, and refuses to comply after being advised, Taipei Metro has the right to deny carriage. In addition, penalties for carrying dangerous objects or deliberately disrupting operations have been strengthened, with fines of up to NT$7,500, reinforcing deterrence through legal consequences rather than relying solely on moral persuasion.

In strengthening civil defense and emergency medical resources, experts widely agree that metro security should not focus solely on preventing incidents, but also on minimizing harm under worst-case scenarios. As a result, in addition to existing AEDs, specialists have recommended placing bleeding-control kits near these devices in stations. Such kits typically include tourniquets and pressure bandages to address severe hemorrhaging caused by random attacks or explosions. This setup can buy critical minutes before emergency responders arrive and significantly increase survival rates. Meanwhile, public education efforts are being expanded to encourage passengers, in the event of an attack, to prioritize distancing and seeking cover, use everyday items such as backpacks or umbrellas as makeshift shields, and promptly report incidents via in-car emergency intercoms or station staff, thereby avoiding secondary injuries caused by panic or stampedes.

As for adopting Shanghai-style comprehensive physical screening, Taipei has remained highly cautious in policy discussions. One major concern is the conflict between efficiency and passenger flow. In Shanghai, full security checks often require one to two minutes of queuing during peak hours. For Taipei’s metro system, which is heavily oriented toward short-distance, high-frequency commuting, such delays could significantly reduce convenience and push passengers toward motorcycles or private vehicles, potentially increasing overall urban risk. Moreover, the crowds formed while queuing for security checks outside stations are themselves viewed by many security experts as new soft targets, where an attack could result in even greater casualties.

Legal and privacy considerations are equally important. In Taiwan, any form of identity or personal inspection must comply with the principle of “reasonable suspicion” under the Police Powers Exercise Act. Implementing blanket security checks would likely trigger serious disputes over legality and privacy rights, and could undermine public trust in the metro system.

Overall, Taipei Metro’s current strategy does not seek to trade efficiency and civil liberties for the visible reassurance of universal security screening. Instead, it focuses on technological early warning, increased police visibility, improved communication and emergency response, and the cultivation of public awareness and self-protection capabilities. While this approach may appear less tangible than metal detectors and bag scanners, it is widely regarded as a more sustainable solution aligned with Taipei’s urban character, balancing freedom, efficiency, and safety in the long term.