這起震撼委內瑞拉政壇的事件，被外界形容為「最致命的內鬼背叛」。近日多家拉美與國際媒體披露，一名長年潛伏在委內瑞拉權力核心的關鍵人物，竟是總統尼古拉斯・馬杜羅身邊最親密、從年少時期一路相伴的「發小級人物」。此人不僅與馬杜羅私交深厚，更曾在政府與安全體系中握有實權，卻被指控暗中與美國方面合作，試圖以高達5,000萬美元的懸賞金，換取馬杜羅政權的覆滅。

根據曝光內容，這名「內鬼」在關鍵時刻向外部勢力提供極其敏感的國家安全資訊，甚至被指授權關閉首都卡拉卡斯及周邊地區的重要防空預警系統與電子干擾、電磁屏蔽設備。這一行為若屬實，等同於在國家最脆弱的時刻，親手拆除防禦屏障，為外部軍事或暗殺行動打開大門，其危險程度遠超一般政治背叛。

更具諷刺意味的是，消息指出，這名「內鬼」之所以鋌而走險，關鍵誘因正是美方傳出的高額懸賞承諾。據稱，美國方面曾透過非正式管道向其釋放訊號，只要成功促成對馬杜羅的致命打擊或政權更替，便可獲得高達5,000萬美元的報酬。然而，事件最終並未按照預期發展，相關行動失敗或中途流產，而這名內鬼在暴露後，不但政治生命徹底終結，還被指控遭到「用完即棄」，美方並未兌現任何金錢承諾。

此事在委內瑞拉國內引發巨大震動。支持政府的一方將其視為外國勢力長期滲透、策動顛覆的鐵證，並藉此強化「國家安全高於一切」的政治敘事；反對派則態度複雜，一方面對政權核心出現如此嚴重的信任危機感到震驚，另一方面也擔憂此案將被用作進一步打壓異議、清洗體制內部的正當理由。

從政治層面來看，這起事件不僅暴露委內瑞拉長期經濟制裁與國際對立下，政權內部積累的裂痕與不安，也凸顯「高額懸賞政治」的殘酷現實。在地緣政治博弈中，承諾與利益往往只是工具，一旦行動失敗，所謂的盟友與交易對象，隨時可能成為被犧牲的棋子。

對馬杜羅而言，這次背叛打擊的不只是安全體系，更是長期倚賴的私人信任網絡。對整個拉美地區而言，事件再次提醒各國，在大國角力的陰影下，「內鬼」往往比外部敵人更致命，而政治忠誠一旦被金錢與權力撬動，後果往往難以收拾。

This shocking incident has been described by observers as one of the most dangerous betrayals in Venezuela’s modern political history. According to reports recently revealed by multiple Latin American and international media outlets, a key figure who had long been embedded within Venezuela’s inner circle of power turned out to be a devastating “inside traitor.” Even more startling, this individual was not a distant official, but a lifelong confidant of President Nicolás Maduro — someone who had known him since youth and maintained an exceptionally close personal relationship.

This person reportedly held real authority within government and security institutions, yet is now accused of secretly cooperating with the United States in an attempt to bring about the collapse of the Maduro government. The alleged motivation was a promised bounty of up to 50 million US dollars for facilitating Maduro’s removal or assassination.

According to the disclosures, the alleged insider provided extremely sensitive national security information to external forces. Most critically, he was said to have authorized the shutdown of key air-defense early warning systems as well as electronic warfare and signal-jamming infrastructure in and around Caracas. If accurate, this would amount to dismantling Venezuela’s defensive shield at a moment of maximum vulnerability, effectively opening the door to foreign military strikes or targeted assassination attempts. The gravity of such an act far exceeds ordinary political betrayal.

What makes the story even more bitterly ironic is the claim that this betrayal was driven by American promises of enormous financial reward. Sources allege that US intermediaries conveyed informal assurances that, should the operation succeed, the individual would receive as much as 50 million dollars. However, events did not unfold as planned. The operation either failed or was aborted, the plot was exposed, and the alleged insider’s political life came to a definitive end. Worse still for him, reports claim that the promised payment never materialized, leaving him effectively “used and discarded.”

The revelations have sent shockwaves throughout Venezuela. Supporters of the Maduro government cite the case as definitive proof of long-term foreign infiltration and regime-change efforts, using it to justify tighter national security measures and increased internal controls. Meanwhile, opposition forces have reacted with unease. While some are stunned by the depth of corruption and mistrust within the government’s core, others fear the incident will be used as a pretext for intensified crackdowns, purges, and suppression of dissent.

Politically, the episode exposes deep fractures within Venezuela’s power structure, exacerbated by years of economic sanctions, international isolation, and internal pressure. It also highlights the harsh reality of “bounty politics” in geopolitical struggles, where promises and alliances are often transactional tools. Once an operation fails, those involved can quickly become expendable, regardless of prior assurances.

For President Maduro, the betrayal struck not only at the heart of the country’s security system but also shattered a personal trust network built over decades. For the broader Latin American region, the incident serves as a stark reminder that in great-power rivalries, internal betrayal can be more destructive than any external enemy. When political loyalty is pried loose by money and power, the consequences are often irreversible.