鶴崗南山煤礦搶劫案，又稱1995年鶴崗1.28大案，是發生於中國黑龍江省鶴崗市的嚴重暴力搶劫案件，也是中國刑事案件史上較為轟動的案件之一。案件涉及多名犯罪分子，作案手段殘忍，損失金額巨大及10名防守警察死亡，引發全國範圍內的關注和震動。

1995年1月28日，正值農曆新年前夕，黑龍江省鶴崗市的南山煤礦正在進行年度的工資發放準備工作。當時，煤礦財務部門攜帶巨額現金，準備分發給工人作為工資和年終獎勵。根據調查，這筆現金的總額超過200萬人民幣，對於當時的經濟水平而言，是相當可觀的資金。

四名搶匪分別是孫海波、閆文宇、田源與田宇，他們對這筆巨款早垂涎已久。事先進行詳盡的踩點和計劃，用噴子及炸藥炸開金庫。田源在犯案過程中受到重傷，為不被留下證據，最終被田宇打死。

在搶劫後迅速逃離現場。他們的作案過程非常老練，幾乎沒有留下任何明顯的線索，這給後續的破案工作帶來極大的困難。案件發生後，煤礦內部人心惶惶，而地方政府和公安機關也面臨巨大的輿論壓力。

由於案件性質惡劣，並涉及巨額資金，中國公安部將此案列為重大刑事案件，全國範圍內展開追捕行動。鶴崗市公安局迅速成立專案組，對案發現場和周邊進行大規模搜查。同時，警方也向周邊城市和省份發出通緝令，希望能夠快速鎖定嫌疑人。

案件初期的調查進展緩慢，因為犯罪分子對現場的處理非常謹慎，幾乎沒有留下指紋或其他直接證據。然而，隨著調查的深入，專案組通過對煤礦內部人員的走訪和線索的分析，逐步鎖定一批可疑人物。經過數月的跟蹤和調查，警方發現，這起搶劫案背後涉及一個組織嚴密的犯罪團伙，而這些人中部分成員與煤礦內部人員有聯繫。

最終，通過警方的不懈努力和多地協同抓捕，犯罪團伙的核心成員被成功抓獲。這些嫌疑人在審訊中供述作案過程及搶劫後的資金分配情況。據悉，團伙成員試圖利用這筆資金潛逃至外省，甚至計劃離開中國，但在警方的高壓追捕下未能得逞。

1995年鶴崗1.28大案的破獲對中國的刑事案件偵破工作產生深遠的影響。這起案件暴露當時煤礦企業在資金管理和安全防範方面的漏洞，也讓全國公安機關認識到，重大經濟犯罪可能涉及內部勾結以及更高程度的組織性，必須採取更加嚴密的防控措施。

在案件破獲後，三人被依法起訴，並立即執行死刑。經過審查期間發現，他們共犯案7起，殺害的人數達15人。

同時，案件發生後，地方政府和企業加強對現金管理的規範，特別是在煤礦等高風險行業中，逐漸推廣非現金支付方式，並增強押運的安全性。

總結來看，鶴崗南山煤礦搶劫案不僅是一樁嚴重的刑事案件，也是中國法治進程中的重要警示事件。它提醒人們，不論是個人還是機構，都應該重視財務安全和防範意識，同時加強對犯罪分子的震懾與追查，確保社會的穩定和公平。

The Hegang Nanshan Coal Mine Robbery, also known as the "Hegang 1.28 Case of 1995," was a violent robbery in Hegang City, Heilongjiang Province, China. This notorious case stands out in China's criminal history for its brutality, massive financial losses, and the deaths of 10 security personnel, drawing nationwide attention and shock.

On January 28, 1995, on the eve of the Lunar New Year, the Nanshan Coal Mine in Hegang City was preparing for its annual payroll distribution. At the time, the mine's finance department was handling a substantial amount of cash intended for workers' wages and year-end bonuses. Investigations revealed that the total amount exceeded 2 million yuan, a significant sum for the economic conditions of the time.

The four robbers—Sun Haibo, Yan Wenyu, Tian Yuan, and Tian Yu—had long coveted the funds. They meticulously planned the heist, conducting detailed surveillance and using firearms and explosives to break into the vault. During the operation, Tian Yuan sustained severe injuries and was killed by Tian Yu to eliminate evidence.

The gang quickly fled the scene after the robbery. Their highly professional methods left almost no traces, making the subsequent investigation extremely challenging. The incident caused widespread panic within the coal mine, while local government and police authorities faced immense public pressure.

Due to the case's severity and the enormous amount of money involved, China's Ministry of Public Security classified it as a major criminal case and launched a nationwide manhunt. The Hegang Public Security Bureau promptly formed a special task force to conduct large-scale searches of the crime scene and surrounding areas. Simultaneously, warrants were issued to neighboring cities and provinces to expedite the identification and capture of the suspects.

In the early stages, the investigation progressed slowly because the criminals had been meticulous in covering their tracks, leaving no fingerprints or other direct evidence. However, as the investigation deepened, the task force gradually identified a group of suspects through interviews with mine personnel and analysis of available clues. Months of tracking and investigation revealed that the robbery was orchestrated by a highly organized criminal gang, some of whose members had connections to individuals within the coal mine.

Eventually, with relentless efforts and coordinated operations across multiple regions, the core members of the gang were apprehended. During interrogation, they confessed to the details of the robbery and how the stolen funds were distributed. Reportedly, the gang had intended to use the money to flee to other provinces and even leave China, but their plans were thwarted by the police's relentless pursuit.

The resolution of the Hegang 1.28 Case in 1995 had a profound impact on the investigation of criminal cases in China. The case highlighted significant vulnerabilities in the financial management and security protocols of coal mining enterprises at the time. It also underscored the need for law enforcement to address major economic crimes involving insider collusion and high levels of organization with more robust preventative measures.

Following the case's resolution, the three surviving members were prosecuted and promptly executed. Further investigations revealed that the gang had committed seven additional crimes, killing a total of 15 people.

The incident prompted local governments and businesses to strengthen cash management regulations, particularly in high-risk industries like mining. Measures such as promoting non-cash payment methods and enhancing the security of cash transport were gradually adopted to prevent similar incidents.

In summary, the Hegang Nanshan Coal Mine Robbery was not only a severe criminal case but also a critical warning in China's legal development. It served as a reminder for individuals and institutions to prioritize financial security and vigilance while reinforcing deterrence and thorough investigations of criminals to maintain social stability and fairness.

照片:DALLE3