這起發生在四川的離奇案件，牽扯出一名寺廟住持、一位已婚女主播，以及一樁高達320萬元的敲詐醜聞。事件的男主角是一名四川石象寺的和尚，身為寺廟住持，本應清心寡欲、遠離塵世誘惑，但他卻在短影音平台上結識一位風姿綽約的女主播。起初，兩人僅是透過網路互動，和尚為取悅女方，不惜在直播間大額打賞，逐漸成為她的「榜一大哥」，關係日益親密。

在虛擬情感的推動下，這段原本不應該存在的聯繫最終走向現實。和尚與女主播相約見面，並在外地酒店開房。殊不知，女主播早已婚配，而她的丈夫正暗中設下圈套。在兩人獨處之時，丈夫悄悄安排拍攝下不雅視頻，準備作為日後勒索的籌碼。

事後，女主播的丈夫主動找上和尚，開出高達320萬元人民幣的天價「封口費」，否則便將視頻公開。面對巨額勒索，和尚與對方多次談判，試圖壓低金額，但雙方未能達成一致。最終，丈夫信守威脅，將不雅視頻曝光，事件瞬間在網絡引發熱議。

這起案件牽出多重爭議：和尚違背戒律、陷入情慾；女主播與丈夫合謀設局、涉嫌敲詐；而不雅視頻的流出，更涉及隱私權及法律責任。據悉，警方已介入調查，並對涉嫌敲詐勒索的行為展開取證。此事不僅衝擊宗教清譽，也再次提醒社會大眾，網絡背後的甜言蜜語與虛擬關係，可能暗藏著無法預料的陷阱與風險。

This bizarre case from Sichuan involves a temple abbot, a married female livestreamer, and an extortion scandal amounting to 3.2 million yuan.

The central figure is the abbot of Shixiang Temple in Sichuan, who, despite his role as a monk expected to live a life of purity and detachment, became acquainted with an attractive female livestreamer through a short video platform. At first, their interactions were limited to the internet, with the monk showering her with generous virtual gifts, eventually becoming her “Top Supporter” (“Number One Patron”) and building an increasingly close relationship.

Driven by this virtual connection, the inappropriate bond eventually crossed into reality. The monk and the livestreamer agreed to meet in person and checked into a hotel together. Unbeknownst to him, the livestreamer was already married, and her husband had laid a trap. While they were together, the husband secretly arranged to record compromising footage, intending to use it as leverage for extortion.

Afterward, the husband approached the monk, demanding an astronomical “hush money” payment of 3.2 million yuan, threatening to release the video if the demand was not met. The monk tried to negotiate the amount down in multiple discussions, but the two sides failed to reach an agreement. Ultimately, the husband carried out his threat, making the footage public, which immediately ignited heated discussion online.

This case raised multiple controversies: the monk’s violation of monastic precepts and moral conduct; the livestreamer and her husband’s alleged collusion in setting up the trap and engaging in extortion; and the release of the explicit video, which involves serious privacy and legal issues. According to reports, the police have already intervened and are collecting evidence regarding the alleged extortion. The incident not only tarnished the reputation of the religious institution but also serves as a reminder that behind sweet words and virtual connections on the internet, there may lurk hidden traps and unforeseen dangers.