一名中國年輕男子，為追求心儀的女子，他選擇極為奇特且不合時宜的方式來表白。他將冥幣（俗稱「紙錢」，通常用於祭祀先人、供奉亡靈的虛構貨幣）摺成玫瑰花束，並將之當作浪漫的禮物送給女子。這位男子或許原本只是想要製造驚喜與浪漫氛圍，甚至可能誤以為這樣的「創意」能打動對方，沒想到女子當下真的被感動，進而接受男子的表白，並與其發生性關係。

然而，事情的轉折發生在隔天。女子在冷靜下來後，發現自己所收到的禮物並非真鈔，而是冥幣，這讓她感到極度憤怒與羞辱。她認為自己被欺騙，隨即報警並指控男子涉嫌強姦。警方介入調查後，經過問詢和確認，最終認定雙方是在自願情況下發生關係，並不存在脅迫或強行的情節，因此不構成強姦罪。警方僅指出這名男子的行為在社會觀感上確實不妥，帶有欺騙性質，屬於道德問題而非刑事犯罪，最後僅對他進行口頭教育與警告，並將其釋放。

這起事件在網路上引爆爭議。許多人批評男子的行為極度荒謬甚至惡劣，認為用冥幣這種帶有「死亡」、「陰間」象徵的物品來追求女性，本身就是不尊重與冒犯，更何況還摻雜欺騙的成分。另一方面，也有人對女子的反應產生討論，認為她之所以在第二天翻臉報警，是因為「發現對方不是有錢人」而非真正遭受強迫，這種情緒轉折反映人性中的複雜矛盾。還有人以戲謔口吻調侃這則新聞，認為整件事帶有「鬧劇」的性質，是一個結合「低俗創意」與「感情糾紛」的奇葩案例。

社會輿論對警方的處理也各有看法。部分人認為警方的定性是正確的，因為法律的核心在於是否存在強迫行為，既然雙方是自願，就不應上升到刑事案件。但也有人認為，男子的欺騙行為本質上已經觸及「詐欺」的範疇，只是目前法律未必能直接適用，導致只能以道德譴責收場。

整體而言，這則新聞不僅因事件荒誕而引人關注，更揭露人際交往中「誠信」與「情感期待」之間的微妙張力。它讓人反思：在追求愛情與表達浪漫的過程中，若失去基本的真誠與尊重，即便一時得逞，也可能在真相揭露後付出更大的代價。

This news story is both absurd and controversial, and it has sparked heated debates online. At the center of the incident is a young man who, in order to pursue the woman he admired, chose an extremely unconventional and inappropriate way to confess his feelings. He folded joss paper—also known as “spirit money,” a symbolic currency traditionally burned as offerings to the dead—into a bouquet of roses and presented it as a romantic gift. Perhaps the man thought this unusual “creative” gesture would surprise her and win her heart. Unexpectedly, the woman was indeed moved in the moment, accepted his confession, and even went on to have sexual relations with him.

However, the situation took a dramatic turn the next day. After calming down, the woman realized that the “gift” was not real money but funeral paper, which made her feel deceived, humiliated, and furious. Believing she had been tricked, she reported the man to the police and accused him of rape. Upon investigation, the police determined that the sexual encounter had been consensual, with no evidence of coercion or force, and therefore it did not meet the legal definition of rape. They concluded that the man’s behavior was morally inappropriate and misleading but not criminal. As a result, he was given only a verbal warning and was released without charges.

The incident quickly went viral online and drew strong reactions. Many criticized the man’s actions as both absurd and offensive, arguing that using joss paper—which symbolizes death and the afterlife—to woo a woman was deeply disrespectful, especially when deception was involved. On the other hand, some people questioned the woman’s reaction, suggesting that she might have turned against him only after realizing he wasn’t wealthy, rather than because she was forced. Others treated the case as a bizarre farce, mocking it as a blend of “cheap creativity” and “emotional drama.”

Public opinion was also divided on how the police handled the case. Some felt the ruling was appropriate, since the law focuses on whether force or coercion was present; because the act was consensual, it could not be prosecuted as rape. Others argued that the man’s actions might qualify as fraud, but due to gaps in the law, the authorities could only issue moral condemnation rather than legal punishment.

Overall, this story became widely discussed not only because of its ridiculous circumstances but also because it highlights the tension between trust and emotional expectation in human relationships. It serves as a reminder that when sincerity and respect are missing in the pursuit of romance, even temporary success can quickly collapse into humiliation and backlash once the truth is revealed.