烏克蘭前議長安德烈·帕魯比(Andriy Parubiy)遭到槍手伏擊後身亡
8月30日,烏克蘭政壇發生重大震動。前議長安德烈·帕魯比(Andriy Parubiy)在西部城市利沃夫遭到槍手伏擊,當場身亡。根據當地媒體與警方消息,行兇者偽裝成外送員,在街頭近距離開槍,連開七至八槍後迅速騎電動自行車逃逸。烏克蘭總統澤連斯基隨即以「恐怖謀殺」形容事件,並下令國家安全部門、內政部與檢察官長全面展開調查。警方也立即啟動代號「Siren」的追捕行動,全力緝拿兇手。
帕魯比在烏克蘭政壇舉足輕重,他是2004年橙色革命與2014年廣場革命的重要組織者,曾在動盪時期擔任自衛隊總指揮,之後進入政壇,並於2016年至2019年間出任最高拉達議長。他的政治立場強烈反俄,積極推動軍隊建設、語言獨立與宗教自主,因而成為烏克蘭民族主義與反俄派的代表人物。他的死引發強烈震撼,前總統波羅申科形容這是「射向烏克蘭心臟的一槍」,各界紛紛哀悼並譴責這是針對愛國人士的蓄意暗殺。至於兇手的動機,目前尚未公開,但各方普遍懷疑與烏俄長期的政治衝突有關。帕魯比的公開立場使他成為俄羅斯及其同情者眼中的眼中釘,因此外界推測事件可能是政治清算的一部分。不過,也有人認為,這起暗殺可能與烏克蘭內部權力鬥爭或利益糾葛有關,調查仍在持續。
帕魯比的遇刺不僅是單一政治人物的死亡,更折射出烏克蘭當前所處的高度不穩定局勢。這起謀殺案暴露了國內安全的漏洞,也加深社會的恐懼與不安。對於烏克蘭政府而言,如何在這樣的時刻維持社會秩序、避免國內政治裂痕進一步擴大,是一項嚴峻挑戰。同時,事件也可能促使烏克蘭在國際舞台上獲得更多同情與支持,進一步強化其反俄立場。
總體而言,帕魯比之死既是烏克蘭政治史上的重大事件,也是對當前政局與社會的一次沉重打擊。他的政治生涯象徵烏克蘭長期以來爭取獨立與民主的努力,而這場暗殺則再次提醒外界,烏克蘭仍深陷戰爭陰影與政治暴力的威脅。
On August 30, Ukraine was shaken by a major political assassination. Former parliamentary speaker Andriy Parubiy was gunned down in the western city of Lviv. According to local reports and police statements, the assailant disguised himself as a delivery worker and ambushed Parubiy on the street. He fired seven to eight shots at close range before fleeing swiftly on an electric bicycle. President Volodymyr Zelensky immediately condemned the incident as a “terrorist murder” and ordered the Security Service of Ukraine, the Interior Ministry, and the Prosecutor General’s Office to conduct a full investigation. Police also launched a special operation, codenamed Siren, to capture the perpetrator.
Parubiy was a highly influential figure in Ukrainian politics. He played a pivotal role in both the 2004 Orange Revolution and the 2014 Maidan Revolution, serving at the time as commander of the self-defense forces. Later, he transitioned into formal politics, eventually serving as speaker of the Verkhovna Rada (Ukraine’s parliament) from 2016 to 2019. Known for his strong nationalist and anti-Russian stance, Parubiy consistently advocated for strengthening the Ukrainian army, consolidating the Ukrainian language, and promoting the country’s religious independence. His assassination sent shockwaves across Ukraine. Former president Petro Poroshenko called it “a shot aimed at the heart of Ukraine,” while politicians and civic groups condemned the killing as a deliberate attack on a patriotic leader.
The motive behind the assassination remains unclear. Many observers suspect Russian involvement or influence, given Parubiy’s uncompromising opposition to Moscow and his role as one of Russia’s fiercest critics in Ukraine. Others suggest the attack could be tied to domestic power struggles or unresolved conflicts within Ukraine’s political elite. Investigations are still ongoing, but the political nature of the killing appears undeniable.
The death of Parubiy is not merely the loss of a prominent politician; it also highlights the fragility of Ukraine’s current security environment. The assassination underscores existing vulnerabilities in law enforcement and has deepened public fears about internal stability. For the Ukrainian government, the challenge now lies in maintaining social order while preventing further escalation of political rifts. At the same time, this tragedy may rally international sympathy and reinforce global support for Ukraine in its ongoing struggle against Russian aggression.
Ultimately, Parubiy’s assassination marks a grim turning point in Ukraine’s modern political history. His career embodied the nation’s long fight for independence and democracy, while his violent death serves as a stark reminder that Ukraine remains haunted by the shadow of war, political extremism, and targeted violence.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4