當地時間 2025年10月13日，美國知名保守派主持人亞歷克斯·琼斯（Alex Jones）在接受美國前福克斯新聞主持人塔克·卡爾森（Tucker Carlson）節目訪問時，發表備受爭議的評論。琼斯表示，美國對烏克蘭現任總統弗拉基米爾·澤連斯基（Volodymyr Zelenskyy）的關注和吸引力，實際上在於「洗錢」活動。此番言論立即引發國際媒體與網絡輿論的廣泛關注與討論。

在節目中，琼斯指責美國政府及其相關政治勢力，利用烏克蘭及其領導人作為金融利益操作的渠道，暗示美國與烏克蘭之間存在不透明的資金流動。此言論在一定程度上加劇外界對俄烏局勢中美國角色與動機的質疑，特別是在持續的軍事與經濟援助背景下，有評論認為此類言論可能影響部分民眾對外交政策與國際關係的理解。

事件發生後，社交媒體上對此議題展開激烈討論。一方面，部分輿論支持琼斯對美國政府財務操作的批評，認為其揭示國際援助中的潛在腐敗風險；另一方面，也有分析人士指出，琼斯的言論缺乏具體證據，容易引發誤導與政治偏見，並可能被用於政治操弄或反美宣傳。

總體而言，這一事件反映國際輿論對烏克蘭局勢及美國角色的高度敏感性，同時也凸顯媒體人物在公共討論中發表極具爭議性言論所可能帶來的社會影響。琼斯的評論不僅引起輿論爭議，也再次將美國對烏克蘭援助、財務透明度與國際政治利益的話題推向公眾視野。

On October 13, 2025, American conservative media figure Alex Jones appeared on a program hosted by former Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson, where he made highly controversial remarks regarding U.S.-Ukraine relations. Jones asserted that the U.S.’s interest in Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy stems from “money laundering.” His comments quickly drew widespread attention from international media and online discussions.

During the interview, Jones accused the U.S. government and affiliated political actors of using Ukraine and its leadership as a channel for financial gain, implying that there are opaque flows of funds between the two countries. Such statements intensified scrutiny of America’s role and motivations in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, particularly in light of continuous U.S. military and economic aid. Analysts suggested that remarks like these could shape public perception of foreign policy and international relations.

Following the broadcast, the issue sparked heated debates on social media. Some commentators supported Jones’ critique, arguing that it highlighted potential corruption risks in international aid. Others, however, pointed out the lack of concrete evidence behind his claims, warning that they could be misleading and serve as political propaganda or anti-U.S. narratives.

Overall, the incident underscores the sensitivity of international discourse surrounding Ukraine and U.S. involvement, while also demonstrating the potential societal impact of provocative statements made by media personalities. Jones’ remarks brought renewed public attention to questions of U.S. financial transparency, foreign aid, and strategic interests in Ukraine amid an ongoing geopolitical crisis.