2025年10月17日下午，烏克蘭總統弗拉基米爾·澤連斯基再次抵達白宮，與美國總統唐納德·川普舉行會晤。值得注意的是，這已經是澤連斯基在八個月內第三次訪問白宮，顯示烏克蘭在國際外交中對美國的高度依賴，以及美國在烏克蘭衝突中的戰略影響力。此次會晤原本外界期待能在軍事援助上達成新的協議，尤其是針對烏克蘭急需的戰斧巡航導彈援助。

據了解，會談中，澤連斯基提出用烏克蘭無人機作為交換，希望美國提供戰斧導彈以加強烏方防禦能力。然而，川普與其幕僚萬斯在聽到這個建議後，兩人對視一笑，並未立即給出明確答覆。最終，雙方在戰略軍援問題上並未達成共識。會後，川普公開表示，不會向烏克蘭提供戰斧導彈，並以一種戲謔的口吻建議：「你們各自宣布勝利吧，讓歷史來決定。」此言論也引發媒體與外交界的高度關注，認為川普的態度表明美國在軍事介入上的限制與策略調整，同時也可能影響烏克蘭在對俄衝突中的作戰計劃。

這次會晤反映幾個關鍵現象。首先，澤連斯基對美國的依賴仍然強烈，無論是軍事援助還是國際政治支持，白宮仍是烏克蘭最重要的外交目標之一。其次，川普的態度則顯示其在烏克蘭問題上的政策相對保守甚至遊戲化，他選擇以幽默或策略性語言淡化直接承諾的壓力。最後，這種「各自宣布勝利」的說法，也被部分媒體解讀為對俄烏衝突無明確勝負的現實承認，暗示美國可能不再積極推動烏克蘭獲得決定性軍事優勢，而是更多依靠外交和政治手段介入。

整體而言，這次白宮會晤雖未達成具體軍事協議，但凸顯烏克蘭在國際政治舞台上持續尋求支持的努力，以及美國內部對於烏克蘭援助策略的不一致性。會談結果短期內可能不會改變戰場態勢，但對外交政策、國際輿論及未來軍援談判具有深遠影響。

On the afternoon of October 17, 2025, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky arrived at the White House to meet with U.S. President Donald Trump. This marked Zelensky’s third visit to the White House within eight months, highlighting Ukraine’s ongoing reliance on the United States for both diplomatic support and strategic backing amid the conflict with Russia. The meeting had drawn significant international attention, with expectations that the two sides might negotiate additional military assistance, particularly regarding Ukraine’s urgent request for Tomahawk cruise missiles.

During the discussions, Zelensky reportedly proposed offering Ukrainian drones in exchange for the missiles, seeking to bolster Ukraine’s defensive and offensive capabilities. However, Trump and his advisor Mike Pence exchanged a knowing smile upon hearing the suggestion and did not provide an immediate commitment. Ultimately, the meeting failed to reach an agreement on military aid. Following the meeting, Trump publicly stated that the United States would not provide Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine and suggested, somewhat playfully, that “you each declare victory and let history decide.” This remark drew widespread attention in both media and diplomatic circles, signaling a restrained and strategic U.S. approach to military involvement, which may influence Ukraine’s operational planning against Russia.

The meeting highlights several key dynamics. First, Zelensky’s repeated visits underscore Ukraine’s strong dependence on U.S. political and military support, making the White House a critical focal point of Ukrainian diplomacy. Second, Trump’s attitude reflects a cautious, even theatrical approach to the Ukraine issue, using humor or strategy to avoid direct commitments. Third, his “declare victory” comment was interpreted by some analysts as an acknowledgment of the uncertain outcome of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, suggesting that the U.S. may no longer actively seek to give Ukraine a decisive military advantage and instead relies more on diplomatic and political means.

Overall, while the White House meeting did not result in concrete military agreements, it underscores Ukraine’s persistent efforts on the international stage and highlights internal U.S. inconsistencies regarding military aid strategy. The outcome may not immediately alter the battlefield situation, but it carries significant implications for diplomatic relations, international perception, and future negotiations over military support.