近日，一則關於企業員工利用外賣訂餐漏洞“白吃白喝”的新聞在網路上引起熱議。事件發生在中國大城市的一家公司內，多名員工因不滿訂餐品質或出於惡作劇心理，先是對外賣餐品給予差評，隨後又向平台提出退款申請，最終成功將餐點“吃白食”，即享受餐品卻不支付費用，這一行為被網友戲稱為“吃白食差評”。

事情曝光的過程十分戲劇化。幾位受影響的外賣小哥在送餐後，發現自己的訂單遭到退款處理，甚至收到來自平台的差評通知，感到極度不滿，於是親自上門尋求說法。當外賣員敲開公司大門，詢問訂餐員工退款及差評的原因時，對方的態度令人大跌眼鏡。多名員工不僅理直氣壯，甚至態度惡劣地回應：“給的就是差評，又怎麼樣？”他們完全不顧外賣小哥的辛勞與心理感受，把這一行為視作理所當然。

這一事件迅速在社交媒體上引起廣泛討論。許多網友對公司員工的行為感到憤怒，認為這不僅是對外賣小哥勞動成果的蔑視，也是對平台規則的惡意利用。有人指出，這種“吃白食+差評”的行為會破壞外賣行業的信任體系，使誠實經營的商家和外賣員承擔不必要的經濟損失與心理壓力。

同時，也有評論者指出，這反映出部分企業文化中對規則意識的淡薄以及員工道德素養的缺失。在這類公司環境下，員工可能普遍認為利用制度漏洞為自己謀取私利是“聰明行為”，而缺乏對勞動者付出的尊重。事件曝光後，有網友呼籲，平台應加強對訂單評價與退款申請的審核機制，防止類似情況再次發生，保護外賣員及商家權益。

值得注意的是，這類事件雖然在網路上引起熱議，但也折射出數字經濟時代的道德挑戰：在便利的線上交易平台面前，一些人可能會因短期利益而忽視基本的倫理規範，對勞動者造成傷害。同時，事件也再次提醒企業管理者，培養員工的職業道德與社會責任感，遠比單純依賴制度規則更為重要。

總體而言，這起“公司吃外賣給差評申請退款”的事件，不僅是一場個人行為的失範，也揭示制度漏洞、企業文化及數字經濟時代倫理的交織問題，引發社會對公平、責任與尊重勞動價值的深入討論。

Recently, a story about corporate employees exploiting loopholes in food delivery platforms went viral in China, sparking widespread outrage. The incident took place in a company in a major Chinese city, where several employees, either dissatisfied with their meals or simply engaging in mischief, gave poor reviews to their food orders and then requested refunds from the delivery platform. In doing so, they effectively ate the meals for free, a practice that netizens have sarcastically dubbed “free-eating with bad reviews.”

The situation escalated dramatically when several affected delivery riders discovered that their orders had been refunded and that they had received negative ratings. Frustrated, they decided to visit the company in person to demand an explanation. When the riders confronted the employees, the response was shocking. Many staff members were defiant and dismissive, reportedly saying, “We left bad reviews—so what?” They showed little to no regard for the riders’ labor or the inconvenience caused, treating their actions as if they were entirely justified.

The incident quickly drew widespread attention on social media. Many netizens expressed anger at the employees’ behavior, viewing it as disrespectful to delivery workers and an abuse of platform rules. Critics noted that such “free meals plus bad reviews” undermine the trust system of the food delivery industry, imposing unnecessary financial and psychological burdens on honest merchants and delivery personnel.

Commentators also pointed out that the episode highlights a broader issue: the lack of ethical awareness and respect for rules within some corporate cultures. In workplaces where exploiting system loopholes is tacitly tolerated, employees may see such actions as clever or acceptable, without considering the harm caused to others. Following the public outcry, some suggested that delivery platforms should strengthen review and refund verification mechanisms to protect both riders and merchants from similar abuses.

Beyond the immediate controversy, this case reflects the ethical challenges of the digital economy. The convenience of online transactions can tempt individuals to prioritize short-term gain over fundamental ethical norms, directly impacting the livelihoods of workers. At the same time, it underscores the importance of cultivating professional ethics and social responsibility among employees—something far more critical than merely relying on rules and regulations.

In summary, the company’s “eating meals, leaving bad reviews, and requesting refunds” incident is not just a story of individual misconduct. It exposes the intersection of systemic loopholes, corporate culture, and digital-era ethics, sparking broader societal debate about fairness, responsibility, and respect for labor value.