2025年10月21日，上海中優城市萬豪酒店因一場高價婚宴引發輿論熱議。一名博主在酒店花費37.98萬元人民幣舉辦婚禮，每桌價格為8888元，但賓客對婚宴菜品質量表示不滿，認為與高價不符，並質疑酒店使用預製菜。博主在社交平臺上上傳婚宴照片和視頻，並進入酒店後廚拍攝所謂預製食材，迅速引發網路關注和討論。

據博主反映，婚宴上的德國鹹豬手、八寶飯、新鮮蝦等菜品存在預製痕跡，部分海鮮貝殼沒有肉，白切雞甚至帶有血水，賓客普遍認為口感和品質不符合高價標準。然而，酒店方面堅決否認使用任何預製菜，聲明“100%沒有一個預製菜”，並通過律師向博主發函，要求其刪除視頻並公開道歉，理由是博主發佈不實資訊。

事件發生後，酒店客服的回應僅稱“已展開調查”，截至10月23日，酒店尚未公佈調查結果或婚宴詳細菜單。此事在社會上引發廣泛討論，輿論關注高價婚宴“價質不符”問題，部分網友質疑酒店可能侵犯了消費者的知情權。法律專家表示，如果酒店未提前告知使用預製菜，有可能違反《消費者權益保護法》，消費者有權要求賠償或申訴。

整體來看，這起事件不僅涉及消費者權益問題，也反映高端婚宴市場在價格、服務與實際體驗之間可能存在的落差，引發公眾對酒店服務透明度和誠信經營的進一步關注。

On October 21, 2025, Shanghai’s Marriott City Center became the center of public controversy over a high-priced wedding banquet. A blogger spent 379,800 RMB to host a wedding at the hotel, with each table priced at 8,888 RMB. However, guests criticized the quality of the dishes, claiming they did not match the high price, and the blogger alleged that the hotel used pre-prepared (pre-packaged) food. The blogger shared photos and videos on social media and even filmed inside the hotel’s kitchen, sparking widespread attention and debate online.

According to the blogger, dishes such as German cured pork knuckles, eight-treasure rice, and fresh shrimp showed signs of being pre-prepared, with some seafood shells empty of meat and poached chicken containing blood. Guests generally felt that the taste and quality did not meet the expectations for the price. The hotel, however, firmly denied using any pre-prepared food, asserting that “100% of the dishes are not pre-prepared,” and issued a lawyer’s letter demanding the blogger remove the content and publicly apologize for allegedly spreading false information.

After the incident, hotel customer service only stated that “an investigation has been launched.” As of October 23, the hotel had not released the results of the investigation or provided detailed information about the wedding menu. The case sparked public discussion about the mismatch between high prices and food quality at luxury banquets, with some questioning whether the hotel violated consumers’ right to be informed. Legal experts noted that if the hotel failed to disclose the use of pre-prepared dishes, it could potentially violate the Consumer Rights Protection Law, giving consumers the right to seek compensation or file complaints.

Overall, this incident highlights not only consumer rights concerns but also the potential gap between price, service, and actual experience in the high-end wedding market, prompting public scrutiny of transparency and honest business practices in the hospitality industry.