美國與委內瑞拉的衝突一觸及發,俄羅斯開始軍援委內瑞拉
近期,圍繞委內瑞拉的局勢迅速升溫,引發國際關注。美國將最先進的福特號航空母艦打擊群派往拉美附近水域,並集結大量空中與海上戰力。美方公開表示,除了海上行動,對境內陸地目標的打擊選項也在考慮之中。在此敏感時刻,一架或數架俄羅斯軍用運輸機 Il‑76神秘降落加拉加斯,令局勢更添地緣政治不確定性。
美國國防部指出,福特號航母打擊群的部署旨在增強對跨國販毒網絡的打擊能力,並保障西半球安全。美方強調這是對委內瑞拉境內非法行動的監控與威懾,但外界普遍將其視為對馬杜羅政權的壓力。與此同時,白宮內部文件和媒體報導顯示,美方曾討論將反毒行動升級至包括地面干預的可能性,多次在委國近海進行B‑1B轟炸機及長程火力演練,顯示局勢存在軍事升級風險。
俄羅斯方面,有報導指出,一架編號為 RA‑78765 的 Il‑76 重型運輸機已抵達加拉加斯,航路經過多段迂迴以避開敏感空域。該運輸機可能搭載軍用裝備、後勤補給或人員,向委內瑞拉和美國傳遞莫斯科對當地局勢的實際支持訊號,增加地區局勢的複雜性。
這場對峙帶來多重風險。首先,軍事升級的誤判風險高企,航母、轟炸機及地面行動選項同時存在,容易引發誤判或小規模衝突擴大。其次,區域政治與外交壓力增加,鄰國面臨選邊困境,俄羅斯與中國等外部力量可能介入,進一步複雜化局勢。第三,經濟與人道影響顯著,能源供應、海運路線及地區難民問題可能受衝擊。
從國際法角度來看,美國若在委內瑞拉本土採取軍事行動,將涉及自衛權、聯合國授權及跨境行動合法性等爭議。美方目前以「打擊跨國販毒和恐怖化犯罪」作為行動理由,但國際社會對此合法性和長期影響仍存在爭議。同時,俄羅斯軍機到訪可被視為對委內瑞拉的支持或對美國軍事施壓的威懾手段,使局勢難以回到低張力狀態。
短期觀察重點包括:一、美軍是否擴大地面或特種部隊行動;二、俄羅斯是否持續提供明顯軍事後援或僅作象徵性展示;三、區域國家及國際組織是否介入調停,這將影響危機是否可緩解。整體而言,委內瑞拉局勢正快速演變,地緣政治緊張程度空前,後續發展仍高度不確定。
Recently, the situation surrounding Venezuela has escalated rapidly, drawing intense international attention. The United States has deployed the USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier strike group to waters near Latin America, along with a concentration of air and naval forces. U.S. officials have indicated that, in addition to maritime operations, options for land-based strikes within Venezuelan territory are under consideration. At this sensitive moment, one or more Russian Il‑76 military transport aircraft have reportedly landed in Caracas, adding further uncertainty and a complex geopolitical dimension to the situation.
The U.S. Department of Defense stated that the deployment of the Ford strike group aims to strengthen operations against transnational drug trafficking networks and safeguard security in the Western Hemisphere. While the U.S. frames this as monitoring and deterring illegal activity within Venezuela, outside observers widely view it as exerting pressure on the Maduro regime. Concurrently, internal White House documents and media reports indicate that Washington has considered escalating counter-narcotics operations to include ground interventions, and B‑1B bombers and long-range strike assets have been mobilized near Venezuelan waters, highlighting the risk of military escalation.
From the Russian side, reports indicate that an Il‑76 heavy transport aircraft (registration RA‑78765) has arrived in Caracas, following a circuitous route to avoid sensitive airspace. The aircraft may be carrying military equipment, logistics support, or personnel, signaling Moscow’s tangible support for Venezuela and complicating the regional security environment for both Caracas and Washington.
This standoff carries multiple risks. First, there is a high risk of miscalculation or unintended escalation, as carrier groups, bombers, and potential ground operations coexist in the same theater. Second, regional political and diplomatic pressures are rising, forcing neighboring countries into difficult positions, while external powers like Russia and China could intervene, further complicating the situation. Third, economic and humanitarian consequences could emerge, affecting energy supply chains, maritime routes, and refugee flows.
From an international law perspective, any U.S. ground action within Venezuelan territory would involve questions of self-defense, U.N. authorization, and the legality of cross-border military operations. The U.S. publicly cites “countering transnational drug and terrorist threats” as justification, but the international community remains skeptical of the legal and long-term implications. Meanwhile, the presence of Russian aircraft can be interpreted as a show of support for Venezuela or as a deterrent against U.S. military action, further complicating efforts to de-escalate tensions.
Short-term developments to monitor include: whether the U.S. expands ground or special forces operations, whether Russia continues to provide overt military support or symbolic gestures, and whether regional nations or international organizations step in to mediate. Overall, the Venezuelan situation is evolving rapidly, with unprecedented geopolitical tension and high uncertainty regarding future developments.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
 
            


