韓國人氣女團New Jeans的解約案最終敗訴,訴訟費用由五位成員負責支付
經過長達一年的法律爭議,韓國人氣女團New Jeans的解約案終於迎來大結局。在這場備受關注的官司中,成員方主張與經紀公司ADOR的合約存在不公平條款,並提出解約申請,希望脫離公司。然而,經過法院審理後,一審和終審均作出ADOR勝訴的判決。法院認為,五位成員提出的解約理由缺乏法律依據,因此其解約申請不成立,必須繼續履行與公司簽訂的原合同。
除了合約履行的判決外,法院還裁定本案的訴訟費用由敗訴方承擔,即由New Jeans的五位成員負責支付。這一判決意味著,成員方不僅無法解除合約,還需承擔法律成本,對成員個人及其未來活動都產生一定影響。
這起解約案自提出以來,就受到韓國娛樂圈和粉絲群體的高度關注。New Jeans作為新興人氣女團,其音樂作品與商業活動均取得顯著成功,但與經紀公司之間的矛盾也被公開放大,引發業界對藝人合約制度、公平權益保障等問題的討論。最終法院判決確定合約有效,也向娛樂圈傳達了法律對合約履行的嚴格要求,同時提醒藝人與公司在簽署合約時應充分理解條款與權利義務,避免未來發生類似糾紛。
After a year-long legal dispute, the contract termination case involving the popular South Korean girl group New Jeans has finally reached its conclusion. The members had claimed that their contract with their agency, ADOR, contained unfair terms and sought to terminate it. However, after careful review, both the trial court and the appellate court ruled in favor of ADOR. The courts determined that the five members’ reasons for contract termination lacked legal basis, and therefore their request to end the contract was invalid. The members are required to continue fulfilling the terms of their original agreement with the company.
In addition to the ruling on contract enforcement, the court also decided that the litigation costs would be borne by the losing party, meaning that the five New Jeans members are responsible for covering the expenses. This judgment not only prevents the members from terminating their contract but also imposes financial consequences, which could affect their future activities and personal planning.
Since its initiation, the case has attracted widespread attention from both the Korean entertainment industry and fans. As a rising girl group, New Jeans has achieved notable success in music releases and commercial activities, yet their publicized dispute with ADOR highlighted issues within the industry regarding artist contracts and fair treatment. The court’s final decision reinforces the legal binding nature of contracts and serves as a reminder that both artists and agencies should fully understand the terms and obligations of agreements to avoid similar disputes in the future.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4