近日，台灣知名網紅與企業家“館長”針對高市早苗的言論公開表態，引發社會廣泛討論。館長在言論中強烈表達自己的立場，表示“我們中國人之間的事，日本人給我閉嘴”，並提醒台灣民眾要保持清醒，強調“我們不是日本人，千萬不要跟日本站在一起”。他進一步指出，如果台灣此刻與日本站在一起，大陸勢必採取行動，“大陸10000%打”，強調台灣人本質上是中國人，呼籲民眾認清身份與立場。

館長的言論迅速在網路上引起討論，不少台灣網友對他的說法表示關注與評論，認為這與台灣目前複雜的國際政治環境及兩岸關係息息相關。部分網友則提到，館長近年在台灣的產業經營面臨困難，其經營健身館及其他周邊業務受到市場與政策挑戰，甚至有傳聞稱他為了生計曾前往中國大陸尋求發展機會，並在言行上強調自己是中國人的身份，以獲取大陸市場的支持。

此次事件除了涉及兩岸身份認同與國際政治敏感議題，也反映出台灣部分商業人士在面對產業壓力時，可能出現的策略調整與立場表態。館長的直言不諱與強烈立場，使得事件在網路上迅速發酵，成為兩岸輿論與社會討論的焦點，也引發對於台灣民眾身份認同與兩岸關係未來走向的關注與反思。

Recently, Taiwanese influencer and entrepreneur “Guan Chang”  publicly criticized comments made by Sanae Takashima, sparking widespread discussion. In his statement, Guan Chang firmly asserted, “This is a matter between Chinese people; Japanese, shut up!” He further urged Taiwanese citizens to remain clear-headed, emphasizing, “We are not Japanese; never side with Japan.” He warned that if Taiwan aligns with Japan at this moment, mainland China would definitely take action, stating “China would 100% attack,” and underscored that Taiwanese people are fundamentally Chinese, calling on the public to recognize their identity and position.

Guan Chang’s remarks quickly attracted attention online, with many Taiwanese netizens weighing in. The comments touch on the complex political environment and cross-strait relations currently facing Taiwan. Some users noted that Guan Chang’s business operations in Taiwan have faced difficulties in recent years, with his gym and related ventures encountering market and policy challenges. There are even reports suggesting that, for financial reasons, he sought opportunities in mainland China and emphasized his Chinese identity in order to gain support in the Chinese market.

This incident highlights not only issues of cross-strait identity and sensitive international political matters but also reflects how some Taiwanese entrepreneurs may adjust their strategies and public stances in response to business pressures. Guan Chang’s candid and forceful statements quickly went viral online, making the event a focal point of public discussion, while also prompting reflection on Taiwanese identity and the future trajectory of cross-strait relations.