前馬戲團成員的詹浩禮曾因金融詐騙罪在2005年入獄，服刑六年後重新出現在大眾視野中。他並未因此收斂，反而換上新的身份標籤，自稱「官二代」，混入娛樂圈與房地產投資圈，包裝出成功人士的形象。在這段期間，他與明星王麗坤的感情傳出消息，據說兩人在2019年10月前後完成結婚或領證。就在外界為明星婚訊討論之際，他已悄悄開始運作一項大規模的房地產騙局——以「回遷房／工抵房」為名，在北京海澱區出售自稱掌握的房源。

所謂的房源名為「雙泉嘉苑」，實際上屬於「京昌路楔形綠地塔院棚戶區改造項目」。詹浩禮宣稱擁有大量回遷房和工抵房的配額，並以遠低於市場行情的價格出售，每平方米五至六萬元人民幣，不到周邊樓盤的一半。海澱本身就是北京教育資源最稠密的區域，「學區房」的吸引力不言而喻，再加上低價、稀缺名額與全款優惠的組合，讓不少家庭心動。最終，超過兩百戶家庭傾盡積蓄，甚至賣房換現投入其中。

這場騙局中不乏大額投資人。有知名化妝品品牌的企業主因與王麗坤存在代言與私人交集，被介紹入場，一口氣認購多套房，投入金額逾億元。詹浩禮能騙過如此多人，核心在於其精心構建的「成功企業家」形象。他不是以仲介身份出現，而是以房地產投資人、文化產業出資人、娛樂圈資深人脈等多重角色示人。他實際控制的公司在短時間內高速擴張，註冊資金迅速增加，法人代表頻繁更換，引起外界懷疑他正透過公司為資金流動與運作鋪路。

2019 年下半年，他在海澱區租下所謂的「銷售中心」。現場佈置齊全，包括沙盤、導購、合同流程等，外觀與真正的開發商毫無二致。於是無論仲介、買家或投資人都被吸引，認為這是一個能低價入手學區房的難得機會。然而等到原訂交付時間到來，房屋毫無動靜。隨著詹浩禮與公司成員相繼失聯，恐慌逐步蔓延，受害者最終選擇報警。警方介入後，整起事件的真相浮上檯面。案件進入司法程式時，涉案金額被確認高達約13.9億元，其中大部分來自普通家庭的購房款，其餘則由大額投資者承擔。

追查資金流向後發現，巨額資金並未用於建房，而是被大量挪用，部分投入影視劇製作，部分轉移至海外，也有相當比例被揮霍於極度奢侈的享樂生活。庭審中，詹浩禮甚至承認，他曾用贓款嫖娼，金額從數萬元到十萬元不等，累計達數百萬。為了隱匿資金，他不僅偽造身份和證件，還頻繁更換公司法人代表，以增加追查難度。案發後，警方查封並拍賣其名下的豪車、名錶、精品包袋、茅臺酒與金條等物品。雖然拍賣所得將作為未來可能的賠償金，但全部加總後仍僅僅是一億多元，與涉案金額相比微不足道，意味著絕大多數受害家庭面臨血本無歸的命運。

案情曝光後，另一位被推上輿論風口的是王麗坤。由於她與詹浩禮的婚姻關係、社交圈與代言資源，一些受害者質疑她是否在不知情下成為「背書者」，甚至是否曾替詹浩禮介紹投資人。雖然目前沒有證據證明她參與詐騙，她本人也強調未收受不當資產，並已離婚且願意配合調查，但事件對她的職業生涯造成巨大衝擊，演藝工作停擺，多個合作終止，公眾形象嚴重受損。然而，在所有討論與批評之外，最深切的痛還是那些普通受害家庭。他們不僅失去積蓄，更失去對制度的信任與生活的支撐。

這起事件暴露回遷房與棚改房交易監管中的巨大漏洞，使得詐騙者能以偽造檔取得可信度；同時也透露資金監管和反洗錢機制的不足，讓巨額資金得以快速轉移；此外，名人代言與投資圈交織的信任效應，使公眾容易因為明星光環而忽略必要的審查；至於司法追贓能力有限，更使得大規模詐騙案中受害者往往難以獲得實質補償。這不僅是一場房地產詐騙，也是一次對制度、監管與社會信任的深刻警醒。

Former circus performer Zhan Haoli, who had been imprisoned in 2005 for financial fraud, re-entered the public eye after completing a six-year sentence. Instead of reforming, he reinvented himself with a new identity label, claiming to be the privileged child of a high-ranking official. With this fabricated background, he slipped into the entertainment industry and real-estate investment circles, carefully packaging himself as a successful businessman. During this period, rumors of his relationship with actress Wang Likun began circulating, and it is said that the two completed their marriage registration around October 2019. While the public was still discussing the celebrity wedding, Zhan had already begun quietly orchestrating a large-scale real-estate scheme—selling what he claimed were “resettlement units” or “construction compensation housing” in Beijing’s Haidian District.

The so-called project, named Shuangquan Jiayuan, was in fact part of the Jiuchang Road Wedge-Shaped Greenbelt Tayuan Shantytown Redevelopment Project. Zhan claimed that he had access to a large number of resettlement units and compensation units, offering them at prices far below market value—50,000 to 60,000 RMB per square meter, less than half the price of surrounding properties. Haidian is known for having the most concentrated educational resources in Beijing, and the allure of “school-district housing” is self-evident. Combined with low prices, limited quotas, and a requirement for full upfront payment, the offer attracted many families. In the end, more than two hundred households poured in their life savings, some even selling their existing homes to gather enough cash.

The scheme also drew in major investors. A well-known cosmetics company owner, who had personal and business ties with Wang Likun, was introduced to Zhan and purchased multiple units at once, investing over one hundred million yuan.

The key to Zhan’s success in deceiving so many people lay in his meticulously crafted image as a “successful entrepreneur.” He did not present himself as a sales agent, but as a real-estate investor, cultural-industry backer, and entertainment-industry insider. The companies he controlled expanded rapidly in a short period, with registered capital increasing sharply and legal representatives changing frequently, prompting suspicions that he was manipulating corporate structures to facilitate the movement and concealment of funds.

In the second half of 2019, he rented a so-called “sales center” in Haidian. The venue was fully set up—complete with floor-plan models, sales staff, and contract procedures—making it indistinguishable from a legitimate developer’s office. As a result, intermediaries, homebuyers, and investors were all convinced that this was a rare opportunity to secure discounted school-district property. But when the promised delivery date arrived, no progress had been made. As Zhan and his associates gradually disappeared, fear spread among buyers, who eventually went to the police.

Once authorities intervened, the truth of the operation came to light. When the case entered judicial proceedings, it was confirmed that the total amount involved reached approximately 1.39 billion RMB, most of which came from ordinary families, with the remainder contributed by large investors.

A financial investigation later revealed that the funds had not been used for construction at all. Instead, vast sums were diverted—some into film and television production, some transferred overseas, and a considerable portion squandered on extravagant personal indulgence. During the trial, Zhan even admitted to spending illicit funds on prostitution, with single transactions ranging from tens of thousands to one hundred thousand RMB, amounting to several million in total.

To hide the money, he not only forged identities and documents but also frequently changed the legal representatives of his companies, complicating the tracking process. After the case broke, police seized and auctioned his luxury cars, designer watches, branded handbags, bottles of Maotai, and gold bars. Although the auction proceeds were set aside for potential compensation, the total recovered amounted to just over one hundred million yuan—utterly insignificant compared to the 1.39 billion involved—leaving most victims facing the likelihood of permanent financial loss.

Following the exposure of the scheme, Wang Likun became another focal point of public scrutiny. Because of her marriage to Zhan, her social connections, and her endorsement activities, some victims questioned whether she had unknowingly served as a “credibility booster,” or whether she had introduced investors to him. While no evidence has been found to show she participated in the fraud, she has emphasized that she received no illicit assets, has already divorced Zhan, and is willing to cooperate with the investigation. Nevertheless, the scandal inflicted severe damage on her career—acting projects halted, commercial partnerships were canceled, and her public image suffered greatly.

Yet beyond all the debate and criticism, the deepest suffering belongs to the ordinary families who were deceived. They lost not only their savings, but also their trust in the system and the stability of their lives.

This case exposed major loopholes in the oversight of resettlement-housing and shantytown redevelopment transactions, which allowed fraudsters to gain credibility through forged documents. It also highlighted weaknesses in financial supervision and anti-money-laundering mechanisms that allowed enormous sums to be transferred quickly and quietly. In addition, the trust effect created by celebrity endorsements within investment circles made the general public more susceptible to deception by the glamour surrounding public figures. The limited ability to recover stolen assets further underscores how victims in large-scale fraud cases often struggle to obtain meaningful compensation.This was not merely a real-estate scam—it was a profound warning about institutional weaknesses, regulatory gaps, and the fragility of social trust.