西安一家泡饃店近日發生一起頗具戲劇性的消費糾紛，過程讓在場的老闆與服務人員哭笑不得。事情的起因並不複雜，四名印度籍留學生到店用餐時點三十串烤肉，上菜後幾人自行清點數量，卻當場認定老闆只烤二十三串，認為商家少給七串，於是要求退款並提出質疑。

面對指控，店內服務生並未立刻與對方爭辯，而是請這四名學生當場再數一次。然而，接下來的場面卻讓人始料未及。幾人在重新清點時，對數字的掌握明顯混亂，從十一、十二之後竟直接跳到十八、十九，中間少算好幾串，結果自然“剛好”對上他們口中的少七串。這一過程不僅讓圍觀者傻眼，也讓老闆和服務員感到相當頭疼。

為了自證清白，服務生索性親自上陣，將烤串一根一根重新清點，過程清清楚楚、不留任何模糊空間。最終的結果卻出乎所有人預料——實際烤好的並不是三十串，而是三十一串，反倒是店家多給了一串。

真相大白之後，服務生也不再客氣，當場把那一串多送的烤肉收回去，動作乾脆又解氣。整起事件在一陣尷尬與失笑中落幕，既澄清了店家的清白，也成一段令人啼笑皆非的小插曲，讓人不禁感嘆，有時候糾紛的關鍵，竟然只是「數數」這件再簡單不過的事情。

A dispute recently occurred at a paomo restaurant in Xi’an, unfolding in a rather comical and awkward manner. The incident began when four Indian international students ordered 30 skewers of grilled meat. After the food was served, they counted the skewers themselves and immediately accused the owner of providing only 23, claiming that seven skewers were missing and demanding a refund.

Instead of arguing back, the staff asked the students to count the skewers again on the spot. What followed left everyone present both stunned and amused. During the recount, the four students appeared confused by the numbers, jumping from eleven and twelve straight to eighteen and nineteen, skipping several numbers in between. Unsurprisingly, their miscount once again “confirmed” the supposed shortage of seven skewers. The scene left the owner and staff visibly exasperated.

To clear up the situation once and for all, a staff member personally stepped in and carefully counted the skewers one by one in full view of everyone. The final result was unexpected: there were not 30 skewers, but 31. In other words, the restaurant had actually given them one extra skewer.

With the truth laid bare, the staff member did not hesitate to take back the extra skewer on the spot, doing so with a sense of well-earned relief. The incident ended amid embarrassment and laughter, clearing the restaurant of any wrongdoing and turning the entire episode into a lighthearted anecdote. It also served as a reminder that sometimes, the root of a dispute can be something as simple as counting.