根據2026年2月日本媒體最新披露，日本神奈川縣警察爆發近年罕見的大規模執法醜聞，多名交通警察被揭發長期偽造交通違規紀錄，涉及案件數量高達約2,700件，成為日本警界近年最嚴重的公信力危機之一。警方目前已啟動全面善後程序，預計退還民眾合計約3,500萬日圓罰金，折合約新台幣740 萬元，同時重新檢視相關行政與刑事責任。

整起事件的問題核心，源自交通機動隊在執行取締勤務時的系統性造假。調查指出，自2022年至2024年期間，部分警員在查緝「超速行駛」與「未保持安全車距」等違規時，並未依規定進行現場測量或蒐證，而是直接在交通罰單與報告書中填寫虛構數據。有些案件甚至完全未進行實地調查，僅透過線上地圖推算距離後便製作正式紀錄，使本應具法律效力的公文書淪為憑空捏造的資料。這類行為不僅違反執法程序，也動搖交通裁罰制度的正當性基礎。

更引發社會震驚的是涉案動機之單純與輕率。多名警員在內部調查中坦承，包括一名警長與督察級幹部在內，之所以偽造測量結果，原因竟是「前往現場測量過於麻煩」，顯示違規行為並非個人偶發，而可能是長期形成的消極勤務文化。調查人員認為，這反映出基層績效壓力、勤務量過重與內部監督機制鬆散等結構性問題，使不當行為得以持續多年未被察覺。

案件曝光的契機來自一名駕駛人的質疑。2024年，一名遭以「未保持安全車距」開罰的司機對處罰內容產生疑問，主動向警方提出申訴，要求確認測量依據。隨著內部重新檢視資料，警方逐步發現多起案件存在數據不合理情形，最終揭開整個交通機動隊內部的系統性造假問題，並擴大清查歷年紀錄。

事件後續影響相當廣泛。首先，所有涉及造假的交通處分將被全面撤銷，除了退還罰金外，相關違規記點也將一併取消，以恢復民眾的駕駛紀錄清白。對於因這些不實罰單而遭吊扣甚至吊銷駕照的民眾，日本警方亦承諾重新審核並修正駕照狀態，避免不當行政處分持續造成生活與工作影響。

在刑事層面，涉案警員已被依涉嫌「偽造公文書」與「行使偽造公文書」等罪嫌移送橫濱地方檢察廳偵辦。依日本刑法規定，此類罪行屬於重大公務犯罪，一旦成立，可能面臨刑責與免職處分，對涉案人員的職涯將造成決定性影響。

此案在日本社會引發強烈討論，不僅因涉案數量龐大，更因交通取締向來被視為最貼近民眾日常生活的警察職務。一旦裁罰正當性受到質疑，將直接衝擊民眾對執法機關的信任。專家指出，未來關鍵在於警方是否能建立更透明的測量紀錄制度，例如強制使用數位測速設備紀錄、即時影像保存，以及第三方稽核機制，以防止類似事件再次發生。

整體而言，這起神奈川交通罰單造假事件已從單純的紀律問題，升級為涉及制度監督、警察文化與行政責任的全國性議題，也被視為日本警政體系必須進行改革的重要警訊。

According to the latest reports from February 2026, Japan’s Kanagawa Prefectural Police has been embroiled in a large-scale law-enforcement scandal involving systematic misconduct by traffic officers. Authorities revealed that approximately 2,700 traffic citations were allegedly falsified, making it one of the most serious credibility crises faced by Japanese law enforcement in recent years. The police have begun comprehensive remedial measures and are preparing to refund about 35 million yen in fines—roughly NT$7.4 million—while reassessing both administrative and criminal responsibilities connected to the case.

At the core of the scandal was systemic fabrication within the traffic mobile unit during routine enforcement operations. Investigations found that between 2022 and 2024, several officers issued citations for violations such as speeding and “failure to maintain a safe following distance” without conducting the required on-site measurements or evidence collection. Instead, officers entered fabricated measurement data into official citation forms and reports. In some cases, officers allegedly created incident reports based solely on online map estimates rather than real-world verification, effectively turning legally binding public documents into fictional records. Such conduct not only violated enforcement procedures but also undermined the legal legitimacy of the traffic penalty system itself.

Public reaction intensified after investigators disclosed the unusually casual motives behind the misconduct. Multiple officers—including a police sergeant and an inspector-level supervisor—admitted during internal questioning that they falsified records because conducting field measurements was “too troublesome.” Authorities believe this indicates the problem was not an isolated lapse but a pattern rooted in workplace culture, potentially influenced by performance pressures, heavy workloads, and insufficient internal oversight mechanisms that allowed improper practices to continue undetected for years.

The case came to light after a driver challenged a citation in 2024. The motorist, who had been fined for failing to maintain a safe following distance, questioned the validity of the measurement and filed a complaint requesting verification. A subsequent internal review uncovered irregularities across multiple cases, eventually exposing widespread falsification within the traffic enforcement unit and prompting a broader audit of past records.

The aftermath has been extensive. All affected citations will be revoked, and in addition to refunding fines, authorities will cancel the associated demerit points recorded against drivers. Individuals whose licenses were suspended or revoked due to these fraudulent tickets will also have their license status corrected to prevent continued personal or professional harm caused by improper administrative actions.

On the criminal side, the officers involved have been referred to the Yokohama District Public Prosecutors Office on suspicion of falsifying official documents and using forged public records. Under Japanese criminal law, these offenses constitute serious misconduct by public officials and may result in criminal penalties as well as dismissal from service if convictions are secured.

The scandal has sparked widespread debate across Japan because traffic enforcement represents one of the most visible and everyday functions of policing. When the legitimacy of citations is called into question, public trust in law enforcement is directly affected. Experts argue that future reforms will likely need to include stricter digital documentation requirements, mandatory recording through certified speed-measurement equipment, permanent video evidence retention, and independent auditing systems to prevent similar incidents from recurring.

Overall, the Kanagawa traffic citation falsification scandal has evolved from a disciplinary issue into a nationwide discussion about institutional oversight, police culture, and administrative accountability, and is widely viewed as a warning sign that structural reforms within Japan’s policing system may be necessary.