近期，蘋果、戴爾、索尼、三星和豐田汽車等企業逐漸從中國撤離，有些甚至直接將生產基地轉移到東南亞或印度。截至目前，外資已連續六個季度撤資，撤出金額高達1600億美元以上。目前，外商投資大陸的金額已呈現負數，這是自鄧小平進行改革開放以來首次出現的情況。這樣的情況勢必對投資、消費和出口的GDP數字造成嚴重衝擊。例如，像富士康等外資企業所創造的出口額幾乎超過了中國全年出口總額的一半，高達1.3兆美元，佔中國外匯儲備的三分之一。外資企業撤離中國可能產生的影響：

1.就業和經濟：外資企業的撤離可能導致失業率上升，尤其是當外資企業是當地主要雇主時。這可能對當地經濟產生負面影響，減少稅收收入和經濟增長。

2.技術和知識流失：外資企業通常帶來先進的技術和管理經驗。他們的撤離可能導致技術和知識的流失，對中國的技術進步和創新能力造成影響。

3.供應鏈中斷：外資企業的撤離可能導致供應鏈中斷，影響到其他企業的生產和運營，甚至可能導致企業直接破產。這對中國的製造業和出口市場造成負面影響。

4.外國直接投資流入減少：外資企業的撤離可能導致外國直接投資流入減少，影響中國的經濟增長和國際貿易。

5.政府收入減少：外資企業的撤離可能導致地方政府收入減少，影響到政府的財政收入和支出。目前地方政府已經無法透過持續賣地來增加收入，外資若持續撤離，屆時可能有許多高額地方債務無法償還。

總的來說，外資企業的撤離可能對中國的經濟和社會產生負面影響，尤其是在短期內。然而，中國政府可能會採取措施來吸引外資，並緩解這些影響，例如提供更好的投資環境和政策支持。但在美國提高對大陸的關稅及許多高科技產品禁止銷往中國的情況下，未來中國的景氣只會更加雪上加霜。

Recently, companies like Apple, Dell, Sony, Samsung, and Toyota have gradually been withdrawing from China, with some even relocating their production bases to Southeast Asia or India. As of now, foreign capital has been withdrawing for six consecutive quarters, with the capital outflow amount exceeding $160 billion USD. Currently, the amount of foreign investment in mainland China has turned negative, marking the first occurrence of such a situation since Deng Xiaoping initiated reform and opening up the market. This situation is bound to have a significant impact on investment, consumption, and export of GDP figures. For example, export volumes generated by foreign-funded enterprises like Foxconn almost surpass half of China's total annual export value, amounting to $1.3 trillion, which constitutes one-third of China's foreign exchange reserves.

The withdrawal of foreign-funded enterprises from China may have the following impacts:

Employment and economy: The withdrawal of foreign-funded enterprises may lead to an increase in the unemployment rate, especially when these enterprises are the major employers in the region. This may negatively affect the local economy, reducing tax revenue and economic growth.

Technology and knowledge loss: Foreign-funded enterprises typically bring advanced technology and management expertise. Their withdrawal may result in the loss of technology and knowledge, impacting China's technological progress and innovation capability.

Supply chain disruption: The withdrawal of foreign-funded enterprises may cause disruptions in the supply chain, affecting the production and operation of other enterprises, and possibly leading to direct bankruptcies. This would negatively impact China's manufacturing industry and export market.

Decrease in foreign direct investment (FDI) inflow: The withdrawal of foreign-funded enterprises may result in a reduction in the inflow of foreign direct investment, affecting China's economic growth and international trade.

Decrease in government revenue: The withdrawal of foreign-funded enterprises may lead to a decrease in revenue for local governments, affecting their fiscal income and expenditure. Currently, local governments are unable to increase revenue through continued land sales. If foreign capital continues to withdraw, many high-debt local governments may struggle to repay their debts.

In conclusion, the withdrawal of foreign-funded enterprises may have negative impacts on China's economy and society, especially in the short term. However, the Chinese government may take measures to attract foreign investment and mitigate these impacts, such as providing a better investment environment and policy support. Nevertheless, with the United States increasing tariffs on the mainland and many high-tech products being banned from being sold to China, the future prospects for China's economy will likely worsen.

照片:DALLE3