被外界稱為「詐騙教父」的楊順隆（也曾使用楊順龍、楊總等化名），在台灣服刑出獄之後，據多方報導與指控，疑似轉往中國大陸持續活動，並以重新包裝身分與企業名稱的方式，延續其過去在未上市股票與投資市場中常見的操作模式。

他離開台灣市場後的最大變化，是不再以早期單純販售未上市股票的方式出現，而是改以更「國際金融化」的包裝重新建立可信度。他刻意淡化過往案件紀錄，並透過多重化名如「楊總」、「楊金主」等身份在市場中活動，同時將自己塑造成具有國際金融背景的人物，甚至宣稱與美國證券監管或投資銀行體系有所關聯，以提高說服力與專業形象。

在所謂「世界金控」等名稱的運作架構下，其核心話術轉向「協助企業赴美上市」。這類模式通常會借用近年金融市場中流行的 SPAC 概念，對外宣稱可以透過海外殼公司或特殊資本市場結構，讓企業快速進入美國納斯達克市場，並強調只要支付高額的顧問費或輔導費，就能在短期內完成上市流程。為了強化可信度，相關操作還會搭配精緻的英文文件、投資計畫書，甚至安排外籍人士或假扮專業顧問進行簡報，使整體場景看起來更接近正規投行運作。

在這些操作之下，不僅企業主成為目標，散戶投資者也常被引導購買所謂「即將上市的原始股」，並被告知未來將有數倍甚至數十倍的報酬空間。然而實際上，這類標的往往缺乏真正的上市進程支撐，資訊透明度極低，甚至可能根本沒有實質營運基礎，只是透過層層包裝形成投資幻象。

由於資金流動涉及跨境結構，相關款項往往透過境外公司、人頭帳戶或加密貨幣等方式進行轉移，使追查變得更加困難。同時，隨著國際監管單位對類似「空殼上市公司」與異常交易行為的關注增加，一些相關企業也陸續面臨財報審查、暫停交易甚至下市的情況。

這類案件之所以反覆出現，本質上仍建立在幾個固定特徵之上，例如過度強調保證上市或高額報酬、要求前期支付不成比例的費用、缺乏可驗證的合法金融執照，以及以「內部消息」或「限量機會」營造急迫感。當這些元素同時出現時，通常就代表風險極高。

整體來看，這不只是單一人物的行為，而是一種在不同時代反覆進化的投資詐騙模型，從早期未上市股票，到政商合作包裝，再到現代的跨境資本市場與 SPAC 話術，本質上仍然圍繞同一個核心：用看似專業與國際化的外衣，掩蓋實際上高度不透明的資金與股權操作。

The figure known in Taiwan media as the “godfather of scams,” 楊順隆 (also known by aliases such as Yang Shun-long or Yang Zong), was previously imprisoned in Taiwan and, according to multiple reports and allegations, later shifted his activities to mainland China after his release. In this later stage, his operating style reportedly evolved from straightforward pre-IPO stock selling into a more complex and internationally branded investment scheme.

After leaving Taiwan’s market, his key strategy reportedly became identity reconstruction and credibility rebranding. He is said to have used multiple aliases to distance himself from his criminal record, while presenting himself as a seasoned international finance professional. In some cases, he allegedly claimed connections to U.S. financial institutions or regulatory bodies, including references to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), in order to enhance trust and legitimacy among potential investors and business owners.

Under entities often described as “World Capital” or similar financial-sounding brands, the core narrative shifted toward “assisting companies to list in the United States.” This typically involved the promotion of SPAC-style or offshore listing structures, where companies were told that by paying substantial advisory or facilitation fees, they could be rapidly listed on major U.S. exchanges such as NASDAQ. The scheme was reportedly supported by polished English documentation, investment proposals, and staged presentations involving individuals posing as foreign consultants or financial experts, all designed to simulate legitimate investment banking procedures.

In addition to targeting business owners seeking public listings, the scheme allegedly extended to retail investors, who were offered so-called “pre-IPO shares” of companies said to be on the verge of listing. These shares were often promoted with promises of extremely high returns once the companies went public. In reality, such offerings typically lacked transparent financial backing or verifiable listing progress, relying instead on narrative-driven valuation and speculative hype.

Funds involved in these operations were reportedly routed through cross-border structures, including offshore entities, nominee accounts, and in some cases cryptocurrency channels, making financial tracing more difficult for regulators and law enforcement agencies. As global scrutiny of shell companies and suspicious listing activities increased, some related entities faced regulatory investigations, trading suspensions, or delisting actions.

The pattern seen in these cases is characterized by several recurring elements: guaranteed or highly certain listing claims, unusually high upfront fees, lack of verifiable financial licenses, and psychological pressure created through urgency and exclusivity. When these factors appear together, they are widely regarded as strong indicators of high fraud risk.

Overall, the situation reflects not only the actions of a single individual, but also an evolving model of investment fraud that adapts to financial trends. It has progressed from early-stage unlisted stock schemes, to politically backed fundraising narratives, and more recently to cross-border capital market storytelling using SPAC and overseas listing concepts, while maintaining the same underlying structure of opacity and investor exploitation.